Transposng the Data Retention Directive in Greece 转置数据保留指令在希腊.pptVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约3.57千字
约 18页
2018-06-19 发布于福建
举报
版权申诉

Transposng the Data Retention Directive in Greece 转置数据保留指令在希腊.ppt

1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Transposng the Data Retention Directive in Greece 转置数据保留指令在希腊

* Transposing the Data Retention Directive in Greece:Lessons from Karlsruhe Anna Tsiftsoglou Spyridon Flogaitis (University of Athens, Greece) 4th International Conference-Information Law Ethics Thessaloniki, Greece, May 20-21st, 2011 What Karlsruhe Said (2010) 1. The ‘Privacy Test’ 10GG ‘informational self-determination’ 8 EU Charter Fund. Rights/ 8 ECHR (privacy) Three-level test (legality – legitimacy – proportionality) Proportionality involves additional safeguards to counterbalance intensity of interference “Diffuse Threat” – chilling effects Data Retention useful law enforcement tool (profiling techniques) Proportionality check Purpose Limitation Minimize Scope of Data Processing – use plain and concrete language- enlist specific crimes High Data Security Standards No discretion left to operators Independent Authorities may assume regulatory role Transparency of Processing Effective Legal Protection Judicial Control/ Legal Sanctions/ Liability Court Assessment Present structure of provisions lacks the above four standards ? dis-proportional Contrary to 10GG/ extends to traffic data Dissent (Schluckebier/Eichberger)- Judicial activism/ changing nature of public safety 2. Telecom Providers ‘Guarantors’ of personal data ? New public-private networks/ data processing models / distributed surveillance Financial burdens – who pays? 12GG/ 14GG/ Art1-First Protocol to ECHR BVerfG says it does not exceed obligations if it is proportional Market assumes cost? shifts it to consumers? 3. Karlsruhe v Luxembourg Karlsruhe v. Luxembourg No referral (267TFEU) to ECJ – no ‘dialogues’ C-301/07 ? ECJ confirmed 95EC as proper legal basis for DRD – reversed PNR ruling Data retention as an ‘internal market affair’ – promoted EU Parliament’s position Principle of Subsidiarity Retention storage ? EU law Access use? national law Karlsruhe v. Luxembourg ‘sovereignty’ v ‘integration’-oriented approach German constitutional identity as upper limit Institutional balances – inte