英语第一章阅读gametheory原文及翻译.docx

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
英语第一章阅读gametheory原文及翻译

game theory is the science of strategy. It attempts to determine mathematically and logically the actions that “players” should take to secure the best outcomes for themselves in a wide array of “games.” The games it studies range from chess to child rearing and from tennis to takeovers. But the games all share the common feature of interdependence. That is, the outcome for each participant depends on the choices (strategies) of all. In so-called zero-sum games the interests of the players conflict totally, so that one person’s gain always is another’s loss. More typical are games with the potential for either mutual gain (positive sum) or mutual harm (negative sum), as well as some conflict.都具有相互依赖的共同特征。也就是说,每个参与者的结果取决于所有人的选择(策略)。在所谓的零和游戏中,玩家的利益是完全冲突的博弈论是战略的科学。它试图从数学和逻辑上确定“玩家”应采取的行动,以确保他们在各种“游戏”中获得最佳成果。所研究的游戏包括从国际象棋到儿童饲养,从网球到收购。但是这些游戏,所以一个人的收益总是另一个人的损失。更典型的是有相互收益(正数)或相互伤害(负数)的博弈,以及一些冲突。Game theory was pioneered by Princeton mathematician john von Neumann. In the early years the emphasis was on games of pure conflict (zero-sum games). Other games were considered in a cooperative form. That is, the participants were supposed to choose and implement their actions jointly. Recent research has focused on games that are neither zero sum nor purely cooperative. In these games the players choose their actions separately, but their links to others involve elements of both competition and cooperation.博弈论由普林斯顿数学家约翰·冯·诺曼先生开创。早期的重点是纯粹的冲突游戏(零和游戏)。其他比赛以合作形式考虑。也就是说,参与者应该共同选择和实施他们的行动。最近的研究集中在既不是零和也不是纯合作的游戏。在这些游戏中,玩家分别选择他们的行为,但他们与其他人的联系涉及竞争与合作的要素。Games are fundamentally different from decisions made in a neutral environment. To illustrate the point, think of the difference between the decisions of a lumberjack and those of a general. When the lumberjack decides how to chop wood, he does not expect the wood to fight back; his environment is neutral. But when the general tries to cut down the enemy’s army, he must anticipate and overcome resistance to his plans. Like the general, a ga

文档评论(0)

wdjp11801 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档