年会论文-皖南国际文化旅游示范区文化资源丰度评价课件.docVIP

皖南国际文化旅游示范区文化资源丰度评价 程晓丽1(，史杜芳2 （1.池州学院旅游与历史文化学院，安徽 池州 247000；2.安徽艺术职业学院基础部，安徽合肥230041) 摘要：以皖南国际文化旅游示范区为研究对象，从文化与旅游融合发展的视角，通过构建区域文化资源丰度评价指标体系，对示范区各地市文化资源丰度进行测度，得出如下结论：皖南国际文化旅游示范区中黄山、安庆、宣城、池州4市的文化资源赋存丰度为优级；马鞍山、芜湖市为良好；铜陵市为差级，优级区主要集中在南部和东西部，南北差异明显。从文化资源组合状况来看，黄山市文化资源组合状况最好，品牌资源众多，开发潜力巨大；其次是宣城、安庆和池州3市，资源类型齐全，组合状态较好；马鞍山、铜陵和芜湖3市较差，类型相对单一，开发难度较大。建议政府部门及旅游业界据此结果科学评估文化资源的价值和开发方向，探索旅游开发的有效模式，推动文化与旅游融合发展，实现示范区优秀文化的传承与创新。 关键词：文化资源；丰度；皖南国际文化旅游示范区 中图分类号：F590 文献标识码：A 文章编号： The evaluation of cultural resources abundance in International Tourism culture Demonstration Zone of Southern Anhui Province Cheng Xiaoli1　Shi DuFang2 (1.College of Tourism and Historical Culture, Chizhou University, Chizhou 247000, Anhui ,China 2.Department of Preparatory Courses, Artistic Vocational College of Anhui, Hefei 230041, Anhui ,China) Abstract: Taking International Tourism Culture Demonstration Zone of Southern Anhui Province as the object of the study, this paper, from the perspective of integrative development of culture and tourism, measures the cultural resources abundance of this area by establishing the evaluation index system of regional cultural resources abundance. The results of the study are listed as follows: in general, International Tourism Culture Demonstration Zone of Southern Anhui Province is quite abundant in its cultural resources, in which Huangshan, Anqing, Xuancheng and Chizhou are the best, then followed by Maanshan and Wuhui, and Tongling is the worst one in evaluation. Viewing from the combination of cultural resources, Huanshan, Xuancheng, Anqing, and Chizhou have done a pretty good job, possessing a complete type of resources，while Maanshan, Tongling and Wuhu are relatively monotonous in types and so difficult to explore. Therefore, this paper suggests that, according to the evaluation results of the cultural resources abundance in this zone, the government and tourism industry should scientifically assess the value of the resources and its exploiting potential,