农业自由贸易与保护主义中英文外文文献翻译2017.docVIP

本科毕业设计（论文） 中英文对照翻译 (此文档为word格式,下载后您可任意修改编辑!) 文献出处：Potter C. Agricultural free trade and protectionism [J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2017, 1(2): 35-45. 原文 Agricultural free trade and protectionism Potter Charls Introduction Debates between advocates of free trade and those who favor more protectionist policies seem particularly charged when the topic is international trade in food and agricultural products. World Trade Organization (WTO) discussions of the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) appear to be dead in the water largely as a result of differences over global rules to govern agricultural trade. The agricultural provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) caused a great deal of consternation in all three countries, and many of the most intractable trade disputes brought to the WTO concern food and agricultural issues (Hobbes2014; Levidow 2014a, b). The controversies surrounding free trade and protectionism for agricultural goods are part of wider debates about the effects of trade on economic well-being and the best way to organize global economic relations. For some, international trade and globalization undermine the rights of workers, thwart efforts to protect the environment, and lower the prospects for economic growth and prosperity in low-income countries (see McArthur and Tucker 2010; Bybee 2008; Zepp-LaRouche 2008). Even for those who believe that an open world trade system is beneficial, however, disagreements about the details of such arrangements are common. When it comes to food and agricultural trade, the diverse points of view often lead to political polarization. The purpose of this entry is to investigate arguments about free trade and protectionism with special emphasis on ethical issues related to international trade in food and agricultural products. The discussion begins with a review of the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century debates about the English Corn Laws which featured many of the arguments still invoked in modern d