船舶建造合同论文:论船舶建造合同的“倒签”问题.docVIP

船舶建造合同论文:论船舶建造合同的“倒签”问题.doc

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
船舶建造合同论文:论船舶建造合同的“倒签”问题

船舶建造合同论文:论船舶建造合同的“倒签”问题 【中文摘要】船舶建造合同的“倒签”是2007年初至2009年初普遍出现在国内造船业界的一种现象。2008年底航运市场和新造船市场随着全球金融危机的爆发而暴跌后,陆续出现了一些涉及“倒签”问题的船舶建造合同的争议,这些争议主要集中在船东质疑此类合同在其准据法下的法律效力。上述“倒签”现象是在特殊市场环境下,受造船企业自身条件所限和受船舶建造合同各当事方的商业利益驱使而产生的,其产生的背景比较复杂;船舶建造合同的“倒签”实际上是各当事方共同操作的结果,应属于合同约定的一部分。因此,即使“倒签”的确会给船舶建造合同带来一定的法律缺陷,影响到合同的强制执行力,但船东作为参与“倒签”的一方并不能以“倒签”为正当理据来推翻合同、并索回预付款;而船东这么做的真正是为了在市场下跌时借助“倒签”问题来向船厂施压,逼迫船厂做出价格折让。为此,对于那些手持订单中仍存有“倒签”合同的造船企业,建议一方面应注重文字证据的整理和收集,为一旦诉诸法律有所准备;另一方面应注意把握船舶建造现场工作的主动权,确保船舶在相关期限届临前达到完工状态。 【英文摘要】The“back-dated”shipbuilding contracts were phenomenon that can be widely found in Chinese shipbuilding industry during the period between early 2007 and early 2009. Right after the shipping and shipbuilding markets抍risis occurred in end 2008, the disputes related to such揵ack-dated攕hipbuilding contracts became to emerge in succession, and among which the majority was oppugning by the shipowners towards the legal effect of such揵ack-dated攕hipbuilding contracts under their applied law.Aforementioned揵ack dating攑henomenon was occurred under a specific market environment, and the揵ack-dated攕hipbuilding contracts were attributed to the shipbuilders抜nner restrictions and were impelled by the commercial interest of the concerned parties; the揵ack-dated攕hipbuilding contracts were as a matter of fact produced by all the concerned parties involved in, and they therefore should be considered as a part of the contractual agreement. And, consequently, although a揵ack-dated攕hipbuilding contract was somehow defective in view of law, i.e. it may not be enforceable or its enforceability will be weaken under its applied law, the揵ack dating攃ould not be regarded as a justified reason for the shipowner to rescinded the shipbuilding contract and sequentially request for refundment. The shipowner抯 real purpose for doing so, however, was to compel the shipbuilder at the era of market crisis in making price reductions.In consideration of the forgoing, for the shipbuilders who still having揵ack-date

文档评论(0)

zhengshumian + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档