明清易代(The dynasties of Ming and Qing Dynasties).docVIP

明清易代(The dynasties of Ming and Qing Dynasties).doc

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
明清易代(The dynasties of Ming and Qing Dynasties)

明清易代(The dynasties of Ming and Qing Dynasties) Is the generation of the Ming and Qing Dynasties the progress of history or the retrogression of history? Only a short while ago, the Ming Dynasty in the eyes of the people is an extreme autocratic, closed, backward and shameless Dynasty, in recent years due to the emergence of Ming Dynasty hot, partially changed peoples impression. So, what kind of dynasty was the Ming Dynasty? How should we view its status in the history of our country? What do historians think of this? In twenty-first Century, with the in-depth study, the academic circles to negate before the Ming Dynasty view has fundamentally changed The Cultural Revolution period of time before the Cultural Revolution, in particular, leftist ideology overflow, denouncing the history of Ming and Qing dynasties. Wu Han and some other older historians evaluation of the history of the Ming Dynasty is generally low. In Taiwan area of China, the evaluation of Ming Dynasty is generally low. In mainland China, until after the reform and opening up, peoples ideological emancipation, values change, the original understanding of the history of the China include review of the history of the Ming Dynasty, changed a lot. In 90s, the world many scholars believe that the fifteenth Century China is not backward, in a leading position in the world. But there are different views, Jilin Provincial Academy of Social Sciences researcher Li Zhiting believes that this argument is quite blind ( Nanming history -- Comment on history of Nanming, historiography quarterly 1999 first). In twenty-first Century, with the in-depth study, the academic circles to negate before the Ming Dynasty view has fundamentally changed. Nankai University Professor Nan Bingwen think, see a dynasty progress is the standard of comparison in the former and whether there is a new contribution, whether to promote social progress. From the previous dynasty, the Ming Dynasty in five aspects reflect the progress: (a)

文档评论(0)

jgx3536 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6111134150000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档