相似句型的辨别（Discrimination of similar sentence patterns）.docVIP

下载本文档

9
0
约 10页
2017-09-14 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

相似句型的辨别（Discrimination of similar sentence patterns）.doc

1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

相似句型的辨别（Discrimination of similar sentence patterns）

相似句型的辨别（Discrimination of similar sentence patterns） When I read, I would like to stay in front of every good thought, just like staying in front of every truth. - Emerson Discrimination of similar sentence patterns Emphasis on sentence patterns: It is/was+ is stressed, part +that/who/whom+, others Pay attention to the following points when using emphatic sentences: 1. emphasize the predicate of the sentence, is or was always use the singular number, in which is can emphasize the present situation, but also can emphasize the past situation, was can only emphasize the past situation. Such as: It, is/was, yesterday, that, I, met, your, father,, in, the, street. 2. no matter which part of the adverbial is stressed, you can only use the that connection, and you should not use where, when and other conjunctions. Such as: It, was, in, the, street, that, I, met,, your, father, yesterday. The 3. part is that when the available who (subjective or objective) and whom (accusative) instead of that, with the that line. Such as: It, was, your, father, that/whom/who, I, met, in,, the, street, yesterday. 4., we should also pay attention to the subject verb agreement, personal agreement and negative transfer in the sentence. Such as: It, is, they, who, are, our, friends. It, was, not, until, ten, oclock, that, we, got,, home, last, night. 5. be careful not to confuse the sentence with the other clause. It is/was ---that - to emphasize a sentence mark, remove it, or form a complete sentence, but not stressed, while other clauses do not have it. Compare: It, was, ten, oclock, when, we, got, home, night., last When we got home last night, it was already ten. It, was, at, ten, oclock, that, we, got,, home, last, night. We got home at ten last night. The first sentence is that, when can not be changed to that, because it was and that removed, only We got home ten oclock. Last night. this is not a complete sentence; the second is that, because was removed it and that, We got home at to fo