身患绝症的人不应该选择结束自己的生命——BPDebate 反方三辩辩论稿.docVIP

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Ladies and gentlemen, our prime Minister and members of Government side, as the member of opposition I would like to present my argumentation which is divided into three parts: rebuttal, statement and conclusion. At first, I’d like to reiterate our team line, that this house believes terminally ill people should not have the choice to end their own life. There are another two aspects to support our team line. We definitely believe that terminally ill people haven’t consider about the feelings of their family members and friends who still have the hope of curing. And the passive thoughts of mercy killing also have a negative influence on society. In the first part of my speech I would like to make my rebuttal. As the number 3 of the government said, mercy killing has already been practiced peacefully by many developed countries and we should learn from these countries. However according to the national situation, legislative environment, and culture convention in China, euthanasia do not have the feasibility of implementation. Because of our country’s economics and politics, there is limitation of the level of medical research. And the basic problem of euthanasia and standards of judgment can not reach an agreement. From the microscopic point of view, the euthanasia have relation with the patients, medical staff, family members of patients and medical institutions this four beneficial sides, there is existence of security risks to implement euthanasia. So it will be a long time for euthanasia to have the feasibility of implementation in our country. Now I’d like to provide my statement. For the first aspect, terminally ill people haven’t consider about the feelings of their family members and friends who still have the hope of curing. As for terminally ill people, a substantial proportion of them suffer a lot from the incurable illness such like cancer. They are too easy to think about death when they are overwhelmed by depression, pai