夏朝的历史其实是商朝的一部分（The history is a part of the Shang Dynasty）.docVIP

下载本文档

4
0
约1.13万字
约 8页
2017-08-03 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

夏朝的历史其实是商朝的一部分（The history is a part of the Shang Dynasty）.doc

1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

夏朝的历史其实是商朝的一部分（The history is a part of the Shang Dynasty） 2008-09-25 22:21, the author: Zhang Siwei With two in the first first unearthed from the ruins of the historical records, the first dynasty, the Xia Dynasty Chinese debate is warm. Although this debate has lasted for nearly half a century, there has been no major improvement in the level of controversy over the years. In addition to some technical aspects, and the Affirmative is still said, without any exchange of ideas at all, let alone to convince each other. Its kind of sad. I have been the theory of the firm = summer supporters. A recent period of time, I because of work reasons, to a few times in southern Shanxi and Northern Henan, while working to several museums and research institutions, and to local researchers on this issue will exchange results deeply touched my inherent thought. This is not because they have made startling new discoveries, but what key evidence has been gained, rather than methodological issues. The root of the argument lies not in evidence, but in methods, in thought patterns. There is no debate and Xia two party should not assume responsibility. Most people (including me recently) have simply equated the summer problem with the problem of a hundred years ago. Before the Oracle has not yet been discovered, the international academic circles also doubted the existence of the Shang dynasty. Results we found that the Shang Dynasty Oracle, there was no one can doubt the fact. The proof should be like this: cultural relics discovered -- found city sites -- decipher text -- ancient Chinese documents confirm and perfect. The process is confirmed what would be different with this? Most people (including me recently) will answer: no different. Most people, including me not long ago, may have been wrong. Because of the Xia Dynasty and Shang Dynasty is completely different, the difference between the Xia Dynasty and the Shang Dynasty, is far greater than the difference between Shang and Zh