一封公开信给查尔斯王子（An open letter to Prince Charles）.docVIP

下载本文档

29
0
约1.11万字
约 11页
2017-08-02 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

一封公开信给查尔斯王子（An open letter to Prince Charles）.doc

1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

一封公开信给查尔斯王子（An open letter to Prince Charles） Dont reject science - Richard Dawkinss open letter to Prince Charles Richard Dawkins The British Observer Conan. Sunday, May 21, 2000 Highness: Your speech at the Rees BBC (Reith Lecture, a famous lecture) saddened me. I deeply appreciate your goal and express my appreciation for your sincerity. But your hostility to science will not help this goal; and your inappropriate use of conflicting alternative methods will cause you to lose respect for others, and I think you deserve respect. Once someone - - I forgot who it was - commented: we certainly have to keep an open mind, but not open to the brain.. Lets look at some of your alternative philosophies, and you seem to prefer them to science. First of all, intuition, the wisdom of the heart, rustled like the breeze blowing through the leaves. Unfortunately, it depends on which intuition you choose. When it comes to goals (not including methods), your instincts are the same as mine. I wholeheartedly join you in protecting our planet and its diverse and complex biosphere. But in Saddam Husseins evil mind, the instinctive wisdom? What is the wind Wagner Hitlers twisted leaves? The Yorkshire Ripper (Yorkshire Ripper, a British serial killer in twentieth Century 70~80 -) hear the voice of religion in his heart let him kill. How do we decide which intuitive inner voice is worth listening to? It is important to point out that this is not a dilemma that science can solve. Im passionate about protecting the world. Its the same feeling as yours. But when I allow emotion to affect my purpose, and when I decide the best way, I choose to think, not feel. And thinking here means scientific thinking. There is no more effective way. If this method exists, science will absorb it. Secondly, your highness, I think you have an exaggerated knowledge of the natural extent of traditional or organic agriculture. Agriculture has never been natural. Our species only bid farewell to our natural hunt