物理理论上的一个认识错误(国外英文资料).docVIP

物理理论上的一个认识错误(国外英文资料) Title: a theoretical error in Physics a native of Shandong Email:lurenbao@ Over the years, I have had some questions and ideas about the theory of positive and negative charges in physics. But not so much in Physics Problems, such as epistemological problems. The question is regarded as a matter of primary, not elementary, physics. Yes, throughout our textbooks and popular science books, people We all use indisputable, axiomatic, obvious, no proof and other indisputable terms to illustrate electricity Is there an objective reason for the existence of Dutch? It is good to talk about some frontiers of physics theory of Ye a contemptuous disregard . There are also enthusiastic friends and teachers who argue with physics theories like quark, gluon, hyper Xuan and big bang Plea. But unfortunately, the premise of our debate is that it does not exist. You may think that my views and inferences are wrong, but... We hope that the debate is the same: positive and negative charge is a property of microscopic particles have? Some people say I ignore the facts of the experiment and talk about the theory. Wrong！ The basis of my doubt is the fact of the experiment; the question is the observer The subjective view of the experimental phenomenon rather than the experimental phenomenon itself; the question is that the concept of positive and negative charges results in the microscopic world Confusion. On the contrary, what is called physics is experimental science, and no philosophical theory is their theory. Of course They dont talk about other peoples theories. They only talk about their own theories - - Kong Des students have been in Physics Quite a few. Of course, my views are shallow, and there are mistakes. Please kindly read my point of view and give it a definite view To criticize, to distinguish between right and wrong. I hope you think this is a problem worth facing. (attached manuscript) A theoretical error in Physics A reflection on the positive and n