X3100性能（国外英文资料）.docVIP

X3100性能（国外英文资料） Post: an analysis of the performance of the Intel X3100 graphics card Intel integrated graphics is the highest market share of the worlds current graphics card, although performance, game compatibility is not very ideal, but the manufacturer is willing to buy it. Today, we want to use the X3100 architecture as a sample to explore the vulnerabilities and concerns of Intels integrated graphics card. The article cites a lot of online information, and I hope you will continue to discuss it. Cost and power consumption First tell me about the cost, the cost of X3100 is quite low, number of transistors and chip area are not to query data, but the years of the development of the northbridge integrated graphics tell us only eight SP unit, and the front-end and back-end extremely simple GPU chip, it should be easy to control the cost. The memory controller, IO controller, and GPU logic of the north bridge chip are estimated to be about 150 million transistors. Power still have data available, 965 gm chipset is the average power consumption of 7 W, relatively low transistor integration, of course, finally makes 965 gm chipset TDP thermal design power consumption 13.8 W. Manufacturing is also a relatively weak link in integrated graphics CARDS, such as the 965GM chipsets using 90 nanometers, while the same period of NV 8400 and ATI 2400 lead its generation. The process is low, it is inevitable to raise fever, and limit the frequency of work and integration. The performance is restricted For any processor, both CPU and GPU, storage subsystem is quite critical, because the processor and memory always part of the information exchange, especially the GPU, memory capacity and speed is critical, because a lot of grain will be stored in the memory, quick call is the prerequisite of processing capacity. And the integrated graphics card has always been a flawed one. The first is speed, and the X3100 doesnt have its own independent memory space, just like any other graph