- 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
网友很全的Argument新总结
PAGE
PAGE 5
Argument 典型错误总结
概念差异
与时俱进
因果关系
错误类比
草率推广
非此即彼
调查问题
成本收益
即非充分又非必要
必要而非充分
对比试验
自相矛盾
信息不完整
反证法
概念差异:攻击概念差异的最基本思路是先指出作者所提出的哪两个概念不能划等号,然后再具体说出他们的不同。
如Argument1,运动服销量≠居民对运动的态度。
句式:
The author falsely/simply equates A with B.
The argument depends on the assumption that A is representative of B.
攻击作者概念不清的句式:
Even assuming…, it is nevertheless impossible to assess the author’s broader contention that …
攻击词汇定义的句式:有时作者对某一关键词定义不清,或根本没定义,从而导致偷换概念的错误。
A threshold problem involves the definition of A; the author fails to define this critical term.
If A is define as…, then … is irrelevant to whether…
时间变化:“与时俱进”
The author’s inference that … rests on the poor assumption that during the … (the interim) all conditions upon which their effectiveness depend have remained unchanged.
+推测法和列举法other facets.
It is assumed without justification that background conditions have remained the same at different times (conditions)
This is an unwarranted(unsound)assumption(假设hypothesis) for the simple reason that things rarely remain the same at different conditions( from place to place.)(官方例句)
The author commits a fallacy of “all things are equal” in assuming that …..
因果关系:
句式:
The author fails to establish the causal relationship between A and B.
Without such evidence, it is equally possible that other factors are instead responsible for…
However, the author provides no evidence to support that that is the case, nor does the author establish a causal relationship between A and B.
前后关系混同于因果关系:
The author commits a fallacy of “after this, therefore because of this” in assuming that …
攻击相关性混同为因果性错误的句式:
While a high correlation is strong evidence of a causal relationship, in itself it is not sufficient.
The author has not shown any correlation, let alone a cause-and-effort relationship, between … and …
攻击错误类比
First of all, the argument is based on an incomplete comparison and is wholly unpersuasive by this analogy. The author simply assumes that … but he does not pr
文档评论(0)