- 1、本文档共18页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
2013年考研英语真题集答案(英语一)
2013年研究生入学考试英语一试题
(内附详细答案)
Section I?? Use of English
Directions:
Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)
People are, on the whole, poor at considering background information when making individual decisions. At first glance this might seem like a strength that?1??the ability to make judgments which are unbiased by? 2??factors. But Dr. Uri Simonsohn speculated that an inability to consider the big? 3???was leading decision-makers to be biased by the daily samles of information they were working with.???4??, he theorised that a judge? 5??of apperaring too soft? 6?crime might be more likely to send someone to prison? 7??he had already sentenced five or six other defendants only to forced community service on that day。
To? 8??this idea, he turned to the university-admissions process. In theory, the??9??of an applicant should not depend on the few others? 10??randomly for interview during the same day, but Dr. Simonsoho suspected the truth was? 11??。
He studied the results of 9,323 MBA HYPERLINK /u/1796892083?zw=edu \t _blank [微博]?interviews? 12??by 31 admissions officers. The interviewers had? 13??applicants on a scale of one to five. This scale? 14??numerous factors into consideration. The scores were? 15??used in conjunction with an applicant’s score on the Granduate Managent Adimssion Test, or GMAT HYPERLINK /u/2654655213?zw=edu \t _blank [微博], a standardized exam which is? 16??out of 800 points, to make a decision on whether to accept him or her。
Dr. Simonsoho found if the score of the previous candidate in a daily series of interviewees was 0.75 points or more higher than that of the one? 17??that, then the score for the next applicant would? 18??by an average of 0.075 points. This might sound small, but to? 19??the effects of such a decrease a candidate could need 30 more GMAT points than would otherwise have been? 20??。
1. [A] grants??????????? [B]submits ???????? [C
您可能关注的文档
- 2012年液压传动考试题库及答案超准.doc
- 2012年造价工程师《建设工程技术与计量(土建)》讲义0203李毅佳.doc
- 2012年高考复习语文新题分类汇编文言文(高考真题模拟新题).doc
- 2012年美国UNF和unc螺纹标准txt.doc
- 2012年高考新课程卷整理及解析(图重绘版).doc
- 2012年造价工程师《建设工程技术与计量(土建)》讲义0202李毅佳.doc
- 2012年高考复习语文新题分类汇编地方特色题型(高考真题模拟新题).doc
- 2012年金属拉伸工(普通组)题库(铜加工).doc
- 2012年高考英语辽宁试题解析考点透析.doc
- 2012年高考数学压轴题精编精解精选100题详细解答.doc
- 区委书记、市国资委党委领导班子2025年组织生活会对照“四个带头”含反面典型案例举一反三剖析方面检查材料【两篇文】.docx
- 局党组书记、市国资委党委领导班子2025年组织生活会对照“四个带头”含反面典型案例举一反三剖析方面个人检查材料2篇文.docx
- 市交通运输局局长2025年专题生活会对照“四个带头”含落实意识形态工作责任制方面个人对照检查发言提纲与检察院领导班子“四个带头”检查材料【2篇文】.docx
- 市投资促进局党支部书记2025年组织生活会对照“四个带头”个人对照检查发言材料与党组书记“四个带头”个人对照检查材料(内蒙古地区四个对照,反面典型案例检视剖析)【2篇文】.docx
- 市教育局党委副书记、市国资委党委领导班子2025年“四个带头”个人对照检查发言材料(上年度整改+个人事项+典型事例剖析)2篇文.docx
- 2025年专题生活会“四个带头”方面对照检视材料(问题+原因+措施+意识形态)与纪检委员专题生活会“四个带头”方面个人对照检查材料【2篇文】.docx
- 检察院领导班子2025年专题生活会对照“四个带头”检查材料与县司法局专题生活会党组书记个人对照“四个带头”对照检查材料(含反面典型案例全面剖析)2篇文.docx
- 市机关事务局党支部书记、局党组书记2025年组织生活会对照“四个带头”含反面典型案例举一反三剖析方面个人发言材料、检查材料【2篇文】.docx
- 2025年领导干部专题生活会“四个带头”对照检查材料与市审计局领导班子专题生活会“四个带头”含反面典型案例剖析对照检查材料2篇文.docx
- 2025年县司法局专题民主生活会班子围绕“4个带头”对照检查材料与反面典型案例回顾与剖析对照检查发言材料2篇文.docx
文档评论(0)