- 1、本文档共93页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
5.6.3结果分析 不一致! * 5.6.3结果分析 * 5.6.3结果分析 当Post hoc和Contracts的结果不一致时,以后者为准。 * 5.6.3结果分析 * 5.6.3结果分析 * 5.6.3结果分析 Mauchly’s test indicated that the assumption of sphericity had been violated for the main effects of drink, χ2(2) = 23.75, p .001, and imagery, χ2(2) = 7.42, p = .024. Therefore degrees of freedom were corrected using Greenhouse–Geisser estimates of sphericity (ε = .58 for the main effect of drink and .75 for the main effect of imagery). Report the results: * 5.6.3结果分析 Report the results: There was a significant main effect of the type of drink on ratings of the drink, F(1.15, 21.93) = 5.11, p = .011. Contrasts revealed that ratings of beer, F(1, 19) = 6.22, p = .022, and wine, F(1, 19) = 18.61, were significantly higher than water. There was also a significant main effect of the type of imagery on ratings of the drinks, F(1.50, 28.40) = 122.57. * 5.6.3结果分析 Contrasts revealed that ratings after positive imagery were significantly higher than after neutral imagery, F(1, 19) = 142.19. Conversely, ratings after negative imagery were significantly lower than after neutral imagery, F(1, 19) = 47.07. Report the results: * 5.6.3结果分析 There was a significant interaction effect between the type of drink and the type of imagery used, F(4, 76) = 17.16. This indicates that imagery had different effects on people’s ratings depending on which type of drink was used. To break down this interaction, contrasts were performed comparing all drink types to their baseline (water) and all imagery types to their baseline (neutral imagery). These revealed significant interactions when comparing negative imagery to neutral imagery both for beer compared to water, F(1, 19) = 6.75, p = .018, and wine compared to water, F(1,19) = 26.91. Report the results: * Looking at the interaction graph, these effects reflect that negative imagery (compared to neutral) lowered scores significantly more in water than it did for beer, and lowered scores significantly more for wine than it did for wat
您可能关注的文档
- 2016届高考一轮复习经济生活第一单元《生活与消费》说课.ppt
- 6吨感应炉项目说课.ppt
- 2016届高考英语二轮复习:专题六情态动词和虚拟语气说课.ppt
- 第六讲彩色图像处理概述.ppt
- 第四节_世界主要气候类型概述.ppt
- A--2011年澳门星河湾·名门世家新品品鉴说课.ppt
- 2016届高考英语一轮复习语法精讲系列:情态动词和虚拟语气说课.ppt
- AAA参考1——零售学与零售管理说课.ppt
- 2016届高考英语总复习(译林版江苏专用)必修4Unit1Advertising说课.ppt
- 第四节_学习与探究—聚落发展与景观变化概述.ppt
- 中国速冻食品行业冷链物流设备与设施投资分析报告.docx
- 2025年数码产品电商品牌运营策略与渠道拓展研究.docx
- 银发经济互联网金融服务市场分析及投资策略报告.docx
- 2025年数码产品电商品牌运营策略的线上线下融合研究.docx
- 2025年数码产品电商品牌运营策略的国际化合作模式研究.docx
- 经营所得季度预缴和年度汇算清缴填报案例 (3).pdf
- 聚焦2025年农村社区养老服务现状与发展策略研究.docx
- 2025年能源与资源行业:太阳能光伏发电市场深度调研及投资建议报告.docx
- 2025年数码产品电商品牌运营策略:物流与配送效率提升.docx
- 快消品电商库存波动分析与应对策略报告2025.docx
文档评论(0)