驳论文Refutation课件.pptVIP

Simple Refutation Steps Mr.Jackson has said that buying insurance provides systematic, compulsory savings. 1.State the argument to be refuted His assumption is that systematic, compulsory saving is a benefit of buying insurance while you are young. But I believe the opposite is true; I believe that it has at least two disadvantages. 2.State what and how youll refute First, the system is so compulsory that if you miss a payment, you stand to lose your entire savings and all benefits. most insurance contracts include a clause giving you a 30-day grace period, after which the policy is canceled. evidence Second, if you need money order to borrow youdesperately, you have to take a loan against your policy. The end result of such a loan is that you have to pay interest r own money. evidence 3.Present reasons and data to support your refutation From this analysis, I think you can see that this systematic, compulsory saving is more disadvantageous than advantageous for people who are trying to save money. 4. Draw a conclusion to show how your reasoning overthrows the refuted argument 目录 CONTENTS contents Definition Steps Type、Way、Strategy Example Two Types of Refutation Direct refutation Direct refutation attacks the arguments of the opponent（论点） with no reference to the constructive development of an opposing view. For example, it attacks the affirmative need issue by demonstrating the error or inadequacy of arguments A, B, and C. The most effective refutation, as you can probably guess, is a combination of the two methods so that the strengths of the attack come from both the destruction of the opponents- views and the construction of an opposing view. Although everyone believes that individuals have the right to risk their own lives. I doubt whether the argument bears much analysis. Few of us, for example, could defend the right to smoke in restaurants, supermarkets, hospitals and other public places when the health of nonsmokers is endangered. Besides, since