Five-YearEvaluationUpdateStudyArea2-Partnership.pptVIP

Five-Year Evaluation - Study Areas 2 3 Study Area 2 Partnerships Background Key findings and Recommendations Study Area 3 Health Impact– Update Evaluation Status Selected Highlights from Interim Report Study Area 2: Background Goal: To evaluate the effectiveness of partnership environment at global and country levels in relation to grant performance and health system effects Approach: Analysis of partnerships and grant performance at global and country level In-depth analysis of partner and grant performance in 16 countries purposely selected to represent poor to good performers Deliverable: Actionable recommendations based on the findings Participating Countries Five-Year Evaluation - Study Areas 2 3 Study Area 2 Partnerships Background Key findings and Recommendations Study Area 3 Health Impact– Update Evaluation Status Selected Highlights from Interim Report TERG Review and Reporting Process TERG had intensive dialogue with the contractors to improve the quality to an acceptable level. In order to facilitate the Board’s deliberations, TERG has prepared a summary report on Study Area 2: Prioritizing, focusing and sharpening recommendations Providing strategic orientation to contribute to the Board’s current strategy discussions Addressing shortcomings and misinterpretations in selected areas Study Findings Exceptionally rapid start-up New model for global public-private partnerships Significant levels of funding Inclusion of new constituencies Country led and demand-driven Without a field structure High standards of transparency Performance-based funding Contribution to strengthening health systems Overarching Recommendations: Overall: Global Fund policy principles remain sound but need for change in behaviour and communication Respect country ownership as the foundation of all Global Fund partnerships and support to country-led programs. Resolve misconceptions regarding Global Fund policies. Global Fund staff should act as ‘am