清华大学考博英语真题阅读理解精选.pdfVIP

清华大学考博英语真题阅读理解精选.pdf

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
清华大学考博英语真题阅读理解精选

中国考博辅导首选学校 清华大学考博英语真题阅读理解精选 Readin Passage 1 The Cost of Survival Most corporations arent managed for change. By Peter McGrath Inthego-goyears of the late 1990s,no economic theorist looked better than Joseph Schumpeter, the Austrian champion of capitalism who died in 1950. His distinction? A theory he called creative destruction.The ideawas straight-forward:inwiththenew,outwith theold.Companieshad lifecycles,justaspeople do.Theywereborn, they grew up. And when a better competitor came along, they died due to capital starvation. It was the way things were, and the way they should be. The markets had no sentiment. Capitalism was relentless, unforgiving. In their book Creative Destruction (367 pages. Doubleday. $27.50), Richard N. Foster and Sarah Kaplan of the consultin firm McKinsey Co. apply Schumpeters logic in the context of a technology-driven economy. They want their corporate readers to understandtheimplicationsofonebasic idea:thereisaninescapable conflict between the internal needs of a corporation and the total indifference capital markets have for those needs. Managers care desperately about the survival of their companies. Investors dont giveahoot.Thiswas alwaystrue,theauthors say,butuntilrecently nobody really noticed because of the relatively languid pace of 中国考博辅导首选学校 economic change. No more. In the 1920s, when the first Standard Poors indexwas compiled, a listed company had a life expectancy of more than 65 years. In 1998the annual turnoverrate of SP firmswas nearly 10 percent, implyin a corporate lifetime of only 10 years. How does anyone manage in this environment? Foster and Kaplan argue that companies today must embrace discontinuity, the idea that everythin they have always done is now irrelevant. Consider Intel:by itstop executives own accounts, the company had to kill its

文档评论(0)

wannian118 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档