世界银行-避孕协调（英）-2025.6.pdfVIP

d

e

z

i

r

o

h

t

u

A

e

rPolicyResearchWorkingPaper11148

u

s

o

l

c

s

i

D

c

i

l

b

u

P

d

e

z

i

r

o

h

t

u

A

e

r

uContraceptiveConcordance

s

o

l

c

s

i

D

cSarahVincent

i

l

b

uCatalinaHerrera-Almanza

P

SAnukriti

MaheshKarra

d

e

z

i

r

o

h

t

u

A

e

r

u

s

o

l

c

s

i

D

c

i

l

b

u

P

d

e

z

i

r

o

h

t

u

A

e

r

u

s

o

l

c

s

i

D

c

i

l

b

u

P

DevelopmentEconomics

DevelopmentResearchGroup

June2025

PolicyResearchWorkingPaper11148

Abstract

Thispaperproposesanindicatorofcontraceptivecon-percent)wereclassifiedaswantingtouseacontraceptive

cordancethatidentifiesthealignmentbetweenstatedmethodatthetimeofthesurvey.While60percentof

preferencesforcontraceptionandconcurrentcontraceptivethesamplewomenareclassifiedtobeconcordant(either

behavior.Theproposedindicatordepartsfromtraditionalwantedusersorwantednon-users),almostoneinfour

approachestomeasurementinfamilyplanningthatinferwomen(24.8percent)stateapreferenceforusingcon-

concordancefromthealignmentbetweenwomen’scon-traceptionbutarenotusers(unwantednon-users),and

traceptive(non-)useandtheirfertilitypreferences.The15.2percentofthewomenstateapreferencefornotusing

indicatorisestimatedusingdatafromacross-sectionalcontraceptionbutareusers(unwanted