减刑“财产性判项履行”认定疑难及解决.pdfVIP

山东农业工程学院学报 2019 ] 36 卷 1 期 减刑“财产性判项履行”认定疑难及解决 陈 海 彬 1 ， 高 源 (1 . 中国人民公安大学，北 京 100038;2.南京森林警官学院，江 苏 南 京 210023) 摘 要 ：自最高人民法院出台《关于办理减刑、假释案件具体应用法律的规定》（以下简称《司法解释》）并首次 把财产性判项履行作为减刑考察因素以来，尽管各类减刑裁定文书中并 以财产性判项作为裁定减 刑的依据，但是事实上由于法院判决的刑事案件中财产刑性的比例非常大，财产性判决作为减刑综合考察因 素几乎贯穿所有减刑的案件。目前有关减刑财产性判项的规定十分有限，现实中存在诸多问题，尤其在“财产 性判项履行”认定上，包括履行能力认定、代履行认定以及部分履行等， 解当前存在的 ，完善“财产 性判项履行”认定 ，对规范减刑制度具有重要意义。 关键词：减刑；财产性判项履行；认定疑难；解决 中图分类号：D923.49 文献标识码：A 文章编号：（095-7327(#019)-01-0071-05 Difficulty and Resolution of Commutation ^Property Judgment Performance^ CHEN Haibin1,GAO Yuan2 (1.PeopleLs Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038； 2.Nanjing Forest Police Academy % Nanjing Jiangsu 210023) Abstract:Since the Supreme Peoples Court cChinese Peopled Public Security Universityame u p《 The provisions on the specific a lication of law on the handling of cases of commutation and parole) (Hereinafter referred to as judicial interpretation) and for the first time , the property judgment has been carried out as an investigation factor for commutation of sentences. Although there is no evidence of the property judgment as the basis for the reduction of penalty in all kinds of commutation adjudication instruments, in fact , the proportion of property and punishment in criminal cases of court judgment is very large , and the property judgment , as a comprehensive investigation factor of commutation , almost runs through all cases of commutation. At present , there are very limited provisions on the subtraction of property penalty items, and there