浅析正当防卫与防卫限度问题.docVIP

第 第 PAGE IV页 摘 要 在我国所有法律制度当中，正当防卫系极为关键的组成部分。在紧急情况中，刑法无法给予公民应有的保护，便给予公民这种较为特别的权利，从而保护国家、个人以及自身所拥有的合法利益。不过，在1997年之际所发布的新版刑法对正当防卫制度进行了修改之后，能够进行正当防卫认定的案件逐渐变少。由于，关于正当防卫的认定标准，司法机关跟普罗大众并不一致，因此后者对于正当防卫以及故意伤害的真正含义并不了解，故而没有办法采取正确的正当防卫方式，其司法系统因此也就不再能够对公民行为进行引导以及规范。所以在关于正当防卫以及其所具备的防卫限度方面，一定要仔细斟酌，通过研究以及分析确认为何会出现此类问题。根据有关司法实践方面的案例来看，某些案例因为争议不小的缘故，往往最后会做出故意伤害的认定结果。首先需要研究存在于防卫认定之时所出现的问题，并且将对应的意见提出，以此来让司法机关有具体的参考范例。紧接着以认定正当防卫跟确认防卫限度之类的方面为出发点，全方位论述研究背景、目的、意义以及内容，同时还需要对现状进行研究，更深层地了解其特征，剖析案例中的争议之处。 最后将个人关于防卫限度的观点发布出来。司法机关所给予的判断，决定了一些防卫行为是不是可以确认为正当防卫。所谓的司法审判，指的是司法人对现有的跟案件能够产生关联的法律法规加以利用，然后跟案件的实际情况相互结合后，来对案情进行确定，司法机关属于对法律进行执行的人，相当于发言人的位置，因此其最为基础的立场应该得到确保。 关键词：正当防卫； 防卫限度；防卫过当；特殊防卫 Abstract Justifiable defense is an important legal system. When the criminal law fails to protect citizens in an emergency, our criminal law gives citizens special rights to protect the country, others, and their own legitimate interests. However, since the new criminal law in 1997 revised the due defense system, the number of cases identified as legitimate defense has decreased. This is because the judiciarys understanding of the standard of justified defense contradicts that of ordinary people. Therefore, the broad masses of people cannot clearly understand what is justifiable defense and what is intentional harm, nor can they effectively implement justified defense, and the justified defense judicial system has also lost its role in guiding and regulating citizens behavior. Therefore, in the face of the problems of legitimate defense and defense limits, we must take it seriously, and carefully analyze and study the cause of the problem. Combining the specific cases in judicial practice, it is found that the legitimate defense cases that have greater controversy in judicial practice are identified as intentional injury. However, the judiciary analyzes the problems in the process of determining the justifiable defense, and then puts forward targeted suggestions, which provides a valuable reference for th