我国环境公益诉讼制度的研究与分析.docxVIP

摘 要 2014年《环境保护法》的修订对现有的整个环境公益诉讼程序都进行了修正，试图建立更有体系更为完善的可操作的系统化制度。但是，我国目前尚未对环境权做出具体规定,环境公益诉讼制度的实践仍处于幼生期 ,原则性的条文较多而关于实质内容的具体化规则缺失；实践过程中，法律权威性也不足，特别是对于原告诉讼主体资格的判断上还有较大的争议。另外，关于实践中诉讼成本过高、激励机制不足等问题依旧存在。针对这些不足，论文将从2014年修订的《环境保护法》的角度，主要针对原告主体资格的可完善性入手探讨将主体范围扩大的可行性。总体而言，应基于我国实践，对于现阶段所发生的实践案例进行一个充分的总结研究，同时结合国外环境法的相关经验，将公民纳入原告范围内，以期更大的发挥环境保护法的作用。同时建立环境公益诉讼激励机制，合理利用虚拟治理成本进行损害赔偿评估，从而构建适合于我国的环境公益诉讼体制。 关键词：环境权；环境公益诉讼；原告主体资格 ABSTRACT The revision of the Environmental Protection Law in 2014 amended the entire existing environmental public interest litigation procedures in an attempt to establish a more systematic and more complete and operable systematic system. However, China has not yet made specific regulations on environmental rights, the practice of environmental public interest litigation system is still in its infancy, there are more principled provisions and the specific rules on the substance are missing; in practice, the legal authority is also insufficient, In particular, there is considerable controversy regarding the judgment of the plaintiffs subject suit. In addition, the problems of excessive litigation cost and insufficient incentive mechanism in practice still exist. In response to these shortcomings, the paper will discuss the feasibility of expanding the scope of the subject from the perspective of the Environmental Protection Law revised in 2014, focusing on the completeness of the plaintiff ’s subject qualification. In general, based on our country ’s practice, we should conduct a comprehensive summary of the practical cases that have occurred at this stage, and at the same time combine the relevant experience of foreign environmental law to include citizens into the scope of the plaintiff, with a view to giving full play to the role of environmental protection law . At the same time, an incentive mechanism for environmental public interest litigation should be established, and the use of virtual governance costs should be used for damage compensation assessme