- 1、本文档共7页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
美罗华联合CHOP方案治疗EBV阳性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的短期随访研究.doc
美罗华联合CHOP方案縮EBV阳性弥漫大B细胞淋
巴瘤究
2018-03-29 10:29:48中国现代医生2018年5期
蔡岗丽
[摘要]戸的評价美罗华联合CHOP方案(环磷酰胺+表阿儘素+长春新碱+强的松)治疗EBV 阳性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的效果,并进行短期随访。方法 选取我院2015年3月?2017 年1月收治的120例EBV阳性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者为本次研究对象,按照治疗方式不同分为对 照组(60例,CHOP方案)与观察组(60例,美罗华+CHOP方案),对比两组疗效、生存率、无 进展生存率、不良反应。结果 观察组临床治疗总有效率为91.67%(55/60),远高于对照组的75.00% (45/60),数据组间对比差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组生存率96.67% (58/60),对照组 生存率91.67% (55/60),数据组间对比差异无统计学意义(P0.05);观察组无进展生存率60.00% (36/60),对照组无进展生存率41.67% (25/60),数据组间对比差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。
观察组在治疗过程中未出现恶心呕吐、发热毒副反应,与对照组对比,差异有统计学意义(P0.05), 其余壽副反应数据组间对比差异无统计学意义(P0.05) o结论美罗华+CHOP方案治疗EBV阳 性DLBCL患者能够有效提升其临床效果与无进展生存率,且降低恶心呕吐、发热毒副反应,其余毒 副反应与CHOP方案无明显差异,可临床应用与推广。
[关键词]美罗华;弥漫大B细胞;淋巴瘤;化学治疗
[中图分类号]R733.4 [文献标识码]A [文章编1673-9701 (2018) 05-0013-04
[Abstract] Objective To evaluate the efficacy of rituximab combined with CHOP regimen
(cyclophosphamide+epirubicin+vincristine+prednisone) in the treatment of EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and to con duct short-term follow-up. Methods 120 patie nts with EBV-positive diffuse large B cell lymphoma who were treated in our hospital from March 2015 to January 2017 were selected as the study subjects and divided into control group (n二60, CHOP regimen) and observation group (n=60, rituximab+CHOP regimen) , according to different treatment methods. The curative effect, survival rate, progress!on-free survival rate and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of clinical treatment in observation group was 91.67% (55/60) , which was much higher than that in control group
(75.00%, 45/60) . There was significant differenee between two groups (P0.05) . The survival rate of the observation group and the control group was 96.67% (58/60) and 91.67% (55/60), respectively, and there was no significant differenee in the data between the two groups(P0.05)? The progressive-free survival rate was 60.00% (36/60) in the observation group and 41.67%
(25/60) in the control group, and the differenee was significant between
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 湘教版八年级地理上册参考教案《中国的民族》教学设计.pdf
- 04D201-3 室外变压器安装图集文本.pdf VIP
- #陕西省小学语文.doc
- 《生活自理我能行》(课件)人教版二年级上册综合实践活动.pptx
- 三级中医医院评审细则三甲中医院评审.pdf
- 铁路机车车辆.ppt
- 统编版语文八年级上册 第26课 诗词五首《饮酒(其五)》《春望》教学设计 .docx
- 模板:课件模板.pptx VIP
- 2023年推进建立中小学校党组织领导的校长负责制经验做法与“党组织领导下的校长负责制”的发展存在的问题及对策建议思考(2份)供参考.docx VIP
- 安徽铜陵下属自然资源和规划局考试试题.docx VIP
文档评论(0)