经尿道输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石分析.docVIP

经尿道输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石分析.doc

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
经尿道输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石分析   【摘要】 目的 探索?尿道输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术用于输尿管结石治疗中的效果。方法 126例输尿管结石患者, 根据治疗方法的不同将患者分为观察组(65例)和对照组(61例)。观察组患者采用经尿道输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗, 对照组患者采用体外冲击波碎石术治疗。比较两组患者一次性结石清除率、二次手术率以及并发症发生率。结果 观察组患者的一次性结石清除率为96.92%, 明显高于对照组的86.89%;二次手术率为1.54%, 明显低于对照组的11.48%, 差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组患者的肾绞痛、恶心呕吐、发热发生率分别为7.69%、15.38%、20.00%, 均低于对照组的21.31%、37.70%、40.98%, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);但观察组患者的血尿发生率为58.46%, 高于对照组的34.43%, 差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 经尿道输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石是可行的、安全的, 结石清除率高, 术后并发症少, 有助于患者术后的康复, 在符合该术式适应证的情况下, 可优先选择。   【关键词】 经尿道输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术;体外冲击波碎石术;输尿管结石;并发症   DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2016.34.014   Analysis of transurethral ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral calculus LI Yu-cai. Guangdong Huidong County Second People’s Hospital, Huizhou 516351, China   【Abstract】 Objective To investigate effect by transurethral ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral calculus. Methods A total of 126 patients with ureteral calculus were divided by different treatment measures into observation group (65 cases) and control group (61 cases). The observation group received transurethral ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy for treatment, and the control group received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy instead for treatment. Comparison was made on one-time calculus clearance rate, secondary operation rate and incidence of complications between the two groups. Results The observation group had obviously higher one-time calculus clearance rate as 96.92% than 86.89% in the control group, and its secondary operation rate was much lower as 1.54% than 11.48% in the control group. Their difference had statistical significance (P0.05). The observation group had incidences of renal colic, nausea and vomiting, and fever respectively as 7.69%, 15.38% and 20.00%, which were all lower than 21.31%, 37.70% and 40.98% in the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P0.05). The observation group had higher incidence of hematuresis as 58.46%

文档评论(0)

聚文惠 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档