Prologue as abstract “afte序言作为抽象的“后.pptVIP

Prologue as abstract “after-the-fact” Elkiya, for instance, mentions that, for starters, it establishes GOD as a petulant, presumptuous buffoon whose uptightness is implicitly at odds with Coyote’s more laidback sensibility; this conflict (“Christian Rules” vs. “Coyote Anarchy,” maybe?) is one that will continue throughout the book. Prologue as abstract “after-the-fact” Elkiya, Sidoeri Dekker, Ryan Hainey and some others also point out that the final sentence of the prologue announces that “the purpose of the story is to explain how all the water got there”: “The four old Indians are arguing about the story and they finally agree that it starts with water being everywhere,” says Elkiya. “Eli Stands Alone lives in a cabin on the reservation that is in the way of the dam operation. I’m guessing there is water everywhere in the abstract/prologue because the dam failed.” Prologue as abstract “after-the-fact” Jessica Schafer and Sidoeri agree: the prologue tells us that that the book is going to be about water. (As Sidoeri puts it: “if you continue reading, a pattern emerges where over and over again the question ‘Where does the water come from?’ is being answered in a slightly different way. In this respect the first three pages are an abstract.”) Prologue as abstract “after-the-fact” But, says Jessica, the prologue also hints that the book will be about remaking or fixing the world—and fixing your mistakes, and running away from/coming back home. Narrative tension/confusion as “rising action” Emily Jacen put it this way: “Each time a clue is revealed or two pieces of the puzzle are connected [what Evan Curry calls “hints of cohesion”] is when the action rises.?This is because the reader has a revelation when they figure each thing out and it gets more complicated and intricate as the story goes on… Narrative tension/confusion as “rising action” “…Also, there are some places [where] the action falls.?For example, every time coyote interrupts.?It’s like, I think