Renal CPD课件.pptVIP

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Self-reported quality of life in children and young people with chronic kidney disease Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Evelina Children’s, St Thomas’, Guy’s St Thomas’ Royal Victoria, Newcastle Alder Hey Royal Belfast Birmingham RHSC Background RRT demanding, time-consuming, invasive ? high demands, daily management, can be restrictive Rx at expense of QoL? GCQ Generic discrepancy measure of psychosocial QoL: Perceived self vs. Preferred self Designed to be completed by child and ‘ease of use’ Developed using constructs provided by children themselves (rather than those adults perceive as relevant) GCQ 25 constructs Social aspects, health, school, home, etc. Gender specific Sample question to clarify understanding 5 point scale Discrepancy ? QoL ? higher score reflect higher QoL GCQ Normative data for general population 6 – 14 yrs. No significant differences in QoL for age, gender or socio-economic status with acceptable reliability Has been used 4/5yo to late adolescence Method 6 – 18 yrs. CKD categories 3 – 5 Educated in English No change in Rx within the previous three months Method Recruited from 7/13 units 6 non-participating units – no clinical psychology or medical support Routine out-pt appt. or after 1hr of stable HD Results No significant differences in QoL scores between units No significant difference b/tw age groups and gender (6-10, 11-14, 15-18 yrs.) No significant difference b/tw treatment modality Results Discussion Confirm findings of pilot study Not saying all CYP with CKD are happy – levels of difference in mood more favourable tolerable Results Discussion Different reference frame? But increased QoL not from lower expectations of self as the renal popltn. actually rate selves higher than general popltn. (Table 4) Results Discussion “life as a chronic renal patient is not as bad as it sounds, compared to other illness such as cancer, heart failure etc. For me I learnt how valuable life is and hope others do.” Results

文档评论(0)

mkt361 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档