毕业设计（论文）关于“钓鱼执法”现象的法律思考.docVIP

关于“钓鱼执法”现象的法律思考 摘 要 近年来，随着行政违法案件的逐渐增多，行政执法中的违法现象也普遍得到了大家的关注，特别是近日上海的两起“钓鱼执法”案件。行政机关采用常规的检查手段已经难以满足打击行政违法行为、制裁违法行为人的需要，于是刑事司法中的诱惑侦查手段越来越多地运用到行政执法过程中。然而，其却以不当的形式来运用这种执法方式从而在执法过程中诱使守法公民违法，此种行为普遍引起了不少公众乃至各界专业人士的不满与批评。本文将围绕上海“钓鱼执法”案件，来揭示“钓鱼执法”现象，并结合行政法学的行政主体和依法行政原则来展开分析与讨论，以及对如何杜绝这种现象再次发生的措施和对策提出若干建议。 关键词：钓鱼执法，行政机关，依法行政原则 About“Fishing Law Enforcement” Phenomenon’s Legal Analysis ABSTRACT In recent years, with the increasing of administrative law case, the administrative enforcement of law phenomenon also generally had everyones attention, recently especially in Shanghai two fishing law enforcement case.The conventional administrative organs of the inspection method has been difficult to satisfy the administrative sanctions against illegal behavior, and the illegal, so the temptation investigation of criminal justice means more and more applied to the administrative law enforcement process, however it is improper to use this form to law enforcement process in the way to entice law-abiding citizens, such behaviour caused a lot of common public discontent and professionals with criticism. This will center around the Shanghai fishing law enforcement ，to reveal the “fishing law enforcement” phenomenon, the administrative law and administrative body as well as the principle of administrative law to analysis and discussion, and how to prevent this phenomena occur again measures and countermeasures of suggestions. KEY WORDS: Fishing law enforcement，Administrative organs，Principle of administration according to law 前　言 1 第1章 “钓鱼执法”的含义及特征 2 1.1 “钓鱼执法”的含义 2 1.2 “钓鱼执法”的特征 3 1.2.1 是一种行政执法行为 3 1.2.2 实施主体是特定的 3 1.2.3 手段具有诱惑性 3 1.2.4 针对的对象是不特定的相对人 4 第2章“钓鱼执法”现象的成因及危害 5 2.1 “钓鱼执法”现象的成因 5 2.1.1 历史成因 5 2.1.2 经济成因 5 2.1.3 思想成因 6 2.2 “钓鱼执法”的危害 7 2.2.1 对公民的危害 7 2.2.2 对政府的危害 7 2.2.3 对社会的危害 8 2.2.4 对社会主义法律的危害 9 第3章 “钓鱼执法”现象违反的行政法学理论 10 3.1 “钓鱼执法”主体不合格 10 3.2 “钓鱼执法”违反行政法的基本原则 10 3.2.1 违反了合法行政原则 10 3.2.2 违反了合理行政原则 11 3.2.3 违反了程序正当原则 11 3.2.4 违反了诚实守信原则 12 3.2.5 违反了权责统一原则 13 第4章 解决“钓鱼执法”现象的