Independent Evaluationlaquo; Quality Assessment of SDCs ：独立评估laquo；nbsp；SDC的质量评价.pptVIP

下载本文档

1
0
约4.97千字
约 20页
2018-04-05 发布于重庆
举报
版权申诉

Independent Evaluationlaquo; Quality Assessment of SDCs ：独立评估laquo；nbsp；SDC的质量评价.ppt

1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

Independent Evaluationlaquo; Quality Assessment of SDCs ：独立评估laquo；nbsp；SDC的质量评价

Steps of an Independent EvaluationCOSTRAComité Stratégique Measures to improve quality Communicated evaluation results / recommendations in all departments Clarified and communicated the palette of instruments Developing toolkit for commissioners of evaluations Intraweb: Description of Process / examples Principles to ensure successful Use of Evaluations Improving training courses: curriculum and availability (1 day training Ext. Evals) Backstopping and Quality Control by the EC Net Palette of Instruments IDEAS Delhi, Workshop – DAC April 2005 Independent Evaluation ??Quality Assessment of SDC’s External Evaluation Reports?? Anne BichselEvaluation + Controlling Division Content Objectives of the Quality Assessment Procedures and Method Findings Recommendations 1. Objectives ot the Quality Assessment To assess the quality of SDC‘sexternal evaluation reports To contribute to improving future performance and achieving a higher evaluation quality of SDC‘s external evaluations 2. Procedures and Method (I) Step I: Random Sample of 12 external evaluation reports Step 2: devise a list of evaluation standards on the basis of- ?DAC Minimum Sufficient Evaluation Standards“- SEVAL Standards- Key questions in Approach Paper 2. Procedures and Method (II) List of evaluation standards with 4 categories Utility (9 standards): readable, accessible, timely evaluations with a good summary Feasibility (3 standards): realistic well thought-out evaluations Propriety (4 standards): ethical aspect of evaluations Accuracy (7 standards): proper scientific methods and procedures 2. Procedures and Method (III) Step 3: review documents, conduct interviews with desk managers and evaluators Step 4: work through all the standards for the sample of evaluations. Result: 12 fact sheets Step 5: analysis and comparison Step 6: conclusions and recommendations 3. Findings (I) Strengths of external evaluation reports Identification and participation of stakeholders Timely reporting C