索债型非法拘禁罪论文：索债型非法拘禁罪若干问题刍议.docVIP

索债型非法拘禁罪论文：索债型非法拘禁罪若干问题刍议 【中文摘要】司法实践中犯罪现象是极其复杂的,对于索债型非法拘禁案件,由于我国刑事立法规定的不明确以及索债型非法拘禁罪与勒索型绑架罪在犯罪构成要件方面的诸多相似,使得在罪名的认定上存在颇多争议。本文以郭某等非法拘禁、强奸他人案为切入点,对索债型非法拘禁罪的认定进行深入研讨,以期对司法实践中处理此类犯罪提供有益帮助。本文分为四个部分,共计约两万字:第一部分:基本案情。详细介绍了郭某等五人非法拘禁、强奸他人案的案情和争议焦点。据此为下文分析问题提供事实依据。第二部分:争议和分歧意见。对案件争议焦点进行阐述并说明各自的理由。主要问题在于罪名的认定上,是构成非法拘禁罪还是绑架罪?是否构成强奸罪?据此为下文的理论分析进行铺垫。第三部分:法理分析。这是本文的主体部分。笔者首先对索债型非法拘禁罪及其特征进行简要叙述,认为案件的关键在于对“债务”的理解,因此对“债务”的性质及定性进行深入的分析。为进一步说明问题,笔者从多个方面对索债型非法拘禁罪与勒索型绑架罪的异同进行了细致的研究以及探讨,提出债务关系是区分二罪的关键,主观故意是区分二罪的重点。同时笔者提出在非法拘禁中行为人要求发生性关系而被害人没有反抗的也属违背妇女意志的情形,理当构成强奸罪,并浅谈了本案涉及的间接正犯的有关问题。为案件的正确定性提供理论依据。第四部分:研究结论。对本案判决进行评析。通过前文对被告人行为的分析得出被告人属于索要自认为确实存在的债务,围绕主观这一犯罪构成要件,理当构成非法拘禁罪;同时认为在证据确实充分的情况下郭某构成强奸罪的间接正犯。 【英文摘要】The criminal phenomenon is extremely complex in judicial practice, for cases of illegal restrain for debts, as criminal law抯 ambiguity and cases of illegal restrain for debts and extortion type kidnapping are so similar that the convicton is on dispute.In this paper, the illegal restrain, rape with others as the breakthrough point, for the case of illegal detention of sin behalf that, in order to further discussion of judicial practice helpful to deal with such crimes.This paper is divided into four parts, including approximately twenty thousand words:Part I: Basic facts. Introducing Mr Guo et al five people with illegal detention, the cause of the case of raping others, including the focus and controversy, and on the analysis of problems for below.Part II: Debate and disagreements. The central issues of paper expounds their reasons and explainanations. The focus is on the conviction, which is unlawful detention or kidnapping or rape? Modules for correctly provide the qualitative books.Part III: Legal analysis. This is the main body part of this paper. The author described the crime of illegal detention briefly, the key is to understand “debt”, therefore “debt” of the nature and qualitative thorough analysis. To further illustration of the crimes抎ifferences, this paper discussed the deb