- 1、本文档共10页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Argument 课堂笔记
Analysis of an argument preparing strategies 1, 熟读题目2, 闪光句型3, critical thinking 4, 形成各类问题自己的分析思路(模板)5, 列每道题提纲6, 全文练习10-20篇Argument writing steps 1, 审题,画逻辑链2, 分析评价每个环节3, 确定要写的环节(列提纲)4, 结合模板展开审题:分清论据和结论,看清推理关系写作原则逻辑:切中要害语言:言简意赅词汇:正规书面语言句式:变化,适度复杂How to write the introduction Basic elements Concession (Cc) Description (D) Conclusion (cl) Evidence/Assumption (ev) Feature (f) Suggestion (S) Evaluation (El) 基本写法D + El Cl + Ev + El 【Evidence与conclusion合并表达】In this argument, the arguer cites the evidence that … to reach the conclusion that …By citing the evidence that … , the arguer concludes that …fallacies in topics 题目中常见缺陷1, flaws in evidence 论据中的问题1) Problems about surveys 调查类问题Procedure of a typical survey 分子群体 (sub-groups) 确定子群体比例 (percentage) 随机取样 (Randomly select sample) A, selective sample 选择性样本Example : A 137 (p63) Many teachers were actually excluded from the survey. The result of the survey lacks credibility because……The result of the survey lacks credibility, therefore could not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. cause-effect fallacy: The arguer fails to establish the causal relationship between A and B. Example 2: A 108 (p55) Without detailed information about the subscribers of ‘Cheese of the World’, we cannot determine whether they are representative of all consumers. The author does not provide any information about the actual profit of domestic and imported cheeses respectively. B, Do the statistics make any difference?调查是否有意义Example : A 81 (p48) In the absence of / For lack of /Lacking / Without / Absent data concerning the total amount of tuna cans sold The argument treats a lack of proof that the cans may pose some extent of health risk as constituting sufficient proof that the cans were not responsible for any of the sickness. C, quantity of the sample 样本的数量Example : A 113 (p56) The sample is too limited. How about other graduates? The arguer commits a fallacy of false analogy. Are these companies comparable? D, What question was asked i
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 基于历史核心素养的学业质量评价——以广东省初中学业水平考试31题为.docx
- Unit 8 Colours 第2课时 Story time(大单元教学设计)三年级英语下册(译林版三起2025).docx VIP
- 2025年中国注射用环磷腺苷项目创业计划书.docx
- 2025年预制菜发展可行性研究报告.docx
- 2023年深圳市高级中学新高一入学分班考试数学模拟试卷及答案解析.pdf VIP
- 天然气工业用户安全培训.pptx VIP
- 2023黑龙江哈尔滨“丁香人才周”(秋季) 事业单位引才招聘巴彦县教师招聘26人笔试备考试题及答案解析.docx VIP
- 交通事故民事起诉状[交通事故起诉状民事].docx VIP
- 交通事故民事起诉状怎么写.pdf VIP
- CJJ1-2008城镇道路工程施工与质量验收规范.docx VIP
文档评论(0)