单篇论著学术迹与影响矩比较研究_唐继瑞.pdfVIP

004 研究论文 Journal of Library Science in China DOI :10. 13530 /j. cnki. jlis. 150006 * ＊ 单篇论著学术迹与影响矩比较研究 唐继瑞 叶 鹰 摘 要 本文对 ， JASIST 2005— 新近提出的学术迹和影响矩指标应用于单篇论著的评价效果进行比较研究 以 2014 25 ASTＲOPHYSICAL JOUＲNAL 2011—2014 24 年间发表的 篇高被引论文和 年间发表的 篇高被引论文为两个 ， h ， 样本集 研究学术迹和影响矩相对于总被引数和 指数等学术评价指标的异同 发现各指标排序既具有一定相关 ， ， ， 。 3 。 性 也呈现出一定独立性 说明这些指标均有独立存在价值 而学术迹和影响矩能提供更全面的测度信息 图 6 。 25 。 2 。 表 参考文献 附录 h 关键词 学术迹 影响矩 学术指标 学术评价 指数 分类号 G353. 1 A Comparative Study of Academic Trace and Impact Torque on Single Publication Jimmy Ｒ. T ANG ＆ Fred Y. YE ABSTＲACT There have been many academic indicators， but few indicators can be applied to appraise single publication， in which counting total citations becomes the simplest approach. Ｒecently，academic trace and impact torque have been proposed and applied，where academic subjects such as authors and institutes are considered，and academic objects particularly single publications are also concerned. In the article，authors compare and analyze the effects of academic trace and impact torque in the applications for single publications，on which further related studies are expected. The authors focus on comparing academic trace and impact torque，with referring to total citation and citing h-index. The academic trace originates from mathematica