comparison of two methods for in vivo estimation of the glenohumeral joint rotation center (gh-jrc) of the patients with shoulder hemiarthroplasty比较两种方法的体内盂肱关节旋转中心的估计(gh-jrc)患者肩膀心脏血管.pdfVIP

comparison of two methods for in vivo estimation of the glenohumeral joint rotation center (gh-jrc) of the patients with shoulder hemiarthroplasty比较两种方法的体内盂肱关节旋转中心的估计(gh-jrc)患者肩膀心脏血管.pdf

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
comparison of two methods for in vivo estimation of the glenohumeral joint rotation center (gh-jrc) of the patients with shoulder hemiarthroplasty比较两种方法的体内盂肱关节旋转中心的估计(gh-jrc)患者肩膀心脏血管

Comparison of Two Methods for In Vivo Estimation of the Glenohumeral Joint Rotation Center (GH-JRC) of the Patients with Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty 1 1 2 2 Ali Asadi Nikooyan *, Frans C. T. van der Helm , Peter Westerhoff , Friedmar Graichen , Georg Bergmann2, H. E. J. (Dirkjan) Veeger1,3 ´ ¨ 1 Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 2 Julius Wolff Institut, Charite, Universitatsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, 3 Research Institute MOVE, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Abstract Determination of an accurate glenohumeral-joint rotation center (GH-JRC) from marker data is essential for kinematic and dynamic analysis of shoulder motions. Previous studies have focused on the evaluation of the different functional methods for the estimation of the GH-JRC for healthy subjects. The goal of this paper is to compare two widely used functional methods, namely the instantaneous helical axis (IHA) and symmetrical center of rotation (SCoRE) methods, for estimating the GH-JRC in vivo for patients with implanted shoulder hemiarthroplasty. The motion data of five patients were recorded while performing three different dynamic motions (circumduction, abduction, and forward flexion). The GH-JRC was determined using the CT-images of the subjects (geometric GH-JRC) and was also estimated using the two IHA and SCoRE methods. The rotation centers determined using the IHA and SCoRE methods were on average 1.4760.62 cm and 2.0760.55 cm away from geometric GH-JRC, respectively. The two methods di

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

xyz118 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档