analysis of the new curriculum standards in the top problem（新课程标准的分析问题）.docVIP

下载本文档

3
0
约1.29万字
约 12页
2017-09-05 发布于浙江
举报
版权申诉

analysis of the new curriculum standards in the top problem（新课程标准的分析问题）.doc

1、本文档共12页，可阅读全部内容。
2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

analysis of the new curriculum standards in the top problem（新课程标准的分析问题）

Analysis of the new curriculum standards in the top problem Abstract In 2003, the Ministry of Education promulgated the lt;lt;high ??school English curriculum standards (test ‘(hereinafter referred to as lt;lt;Curriculumgt;gt;) expressly states:’ shall be published student test scores, nor a ranking by test scores. ‘This The introduction of a policy of ‘ranking’ of the controversial topic up to the ‘law’ in height. ranked as an evaluation mechanism, it is no good or bad in itself, the main parties to see how to look, how to use this mechanism of this paper has focused on whether it should ‘publish rankings’ and ‘published rankings,’ the scope and modalities, as well as the interpretation of the top ranking in this, the author proposes his own on the ‘top’ of this issue for some suggestions. 0 Introduction The proposed new curriculum standards is a major innovation in the education sector, it is a leap forward in China’s education development. Reform with the purpose of examination-oriented, promote the comprehensive development of every student, every school to train to become ‘human’ Holy Land, rather than production of ‘objects’ of the plant in the traditional teaching forms of organization, the only student evaluation scores, good scores all is well, everything bad score is not good, that ‘only scores on the’ is actually the wrong positioning of education (high score, low score low compulsive Through tests and rankings we see The concept of teacher education is rigid and backward is undeniable is that of school education, the score is important, but more important than the scores of learning ability, learning ability is more important than is a man, because only with a strong competitive higher psychological endurance of the modern consciousness and social development to adapt to the needs of high-performance teaching must not sacrifice the health of students and the moral decline of the cost (For lumber, the first adult), education, education must be t