《普通逻辑学》答题方法指导(Guidelines for answering questions in general logic).docVIP

《普通逻辑学》答题方法指导(Guidelines for answering questions in general logic).doc

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
《普通逻辑学》答题方法指导(Guidelines for answering questions in general logic)

《普通逻辑学》答题方法指导(Guidelines for answering questions in general logic) Guidelines for answering questions in general logic First, reasoning questions answer method guidance Reasoning is the main part of ordinary logic. Improving students reasoning ability is an important goal of general logic teaching. Therefore, the reasoning question is one of the key points of the logic test. In answering logical reasoning, we should pay attention to the following points: First, accurately understand the questions, no provisions the test conditions, do not own any additional. Please look at the questions and answers below: Please use the relevant knowledge of syllogism to answer the following questions: 1, to all the A is not B, all the B is not C premise syllogism reasoning, whether the introduction of conclusions? If so, what is the conclusion? 2, A judgment as the major premise, E judgment as a minor premise for syllogism reasoning, whether the introduction of conclusions? Why? A: the first question can draw a conclusion. The conclusion is that some C are not A. The second question can not be. Because according to the reasoning rule of syllogism, one of the two premises is negative, then the conclusion must be negative. Now, one of the premises is negative, so the conclusion must be negative. According to the rules of syllogism, is not distributive in the premise, the conclusion may not be comprehensive, now major P is distributed in the conclusion, so the premise must also be perfect, but the premise is all S is P, P is not comprehensive. Thus it can be seen that the judgment of A is the premise, and the judgment of E as a minor premise can not be introduced. In this way, the answer is logically problematic. First look at the first question, the test requirements in order to all A is B and all B not C as the premise, but does not specify which one for the premise, which is a small premise, answer (1) is decided by the all A B is not the premise of all B is C for the small premise

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

f8r9t5c + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8000054077000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档