再论体质论与技能论[J].PDFVIP

第16卷第10期 体 育 学 刊 Vol.16 No.10 2009 年 10 月 Journal of Physical Education O c t . 2 0 0 9 再论“体质论”与“技能论” ——兼评张洪潭之“技术健身论” 3 张磊 （杭州师范大学体育与健康学院，浙江 杭州 310036 ） 摘 要：关于学校体育教学目的一直存在着“技能论”与“体质论”之争，张洪潭教授在剖 析两者的基础上援引“互补原理”形成了独特的“技术健身论”思想。“体质论”属于目的层面， “技能论”是手段层面，两者不是同一层次上的相互对立的两个问题，“技术健身论”将“强化体 能”与“传授技能”同时作为学校体育教学的目的是不恰当的，这也使得“互补原理”的引入值 得商榷。但“技术健身论”仍不失为现阶段学校体育教学理论的主要观点，其通过运动技术的学 习达到健身强体之目的的思想可以说具有重要的启发意义与现实价值。 关 键 词：学校体育；强化体能；传授技能；技术健身论 中图分类号：G807 文献标识码：A 文章编号：1006-7116(2009)10-0011-03 A further discussion about the “view of constitution” and the “view of skills” ——Also a review of the “view of fitness made from technology” of Dr. ZHANG Hong-tan ZHANG Lei （School of Physical Education and Health，Hangzhou Normal University ，Hangzhou 310036 ，China ） Abstract: Over a long period of time, there were debates about the purpose of the teaching of school physical edu- cation between the “view of skills” and the “view of constitution”. On the basis of profoundly dissecting the two views, Dr. ZHANG Hong-tan had formed such a unique ideology as the “view of fitness made from technology” by referring to the “complementary principle”. The “view of constitution” focuses on the purpose, while the “view of skills” focuses on the mean; these two views are not two mutually opposite issues at the same level; therefore, it is not appropriate for the “view of fitness made from technology” to set both “strengthening physical stamina” and “teaching skills” as the purpose