宋代积贫积弱说商榷（The song poor and weak discussion）.docVIP

宋代积贫积弱说商榷（The song poor and weak discussion） The song poor and weak discussion Source: Chinese Song Dynasty history research Author: Li Yumin Li Yumin, (1940 -), male, Zhejiang, Tongxiang, Professor of history and culture, Shaanxi Normal University, Ph. D. supervisor. Abstract: since Qian Muwei proposed the song poor and weak, almost everyone takes it as the basic characteristics of the Song Dynasty, but this does not accord with the facts. The site of the Song Dynasty was smaller than that of the Tang Dynasty, but the economy was more developed than that of the Tang Dynasty, and the financial revenue was higher than that of the Tang Dynasty. The three major inventions of the four great inventions were mainly in the Song Dynasty, and they were not poor or even richer than any other dynasty. Such as from the military strength of the strength of song, Liao and Jin than weaker, lack of offensive force, the defense is more than. And Xixia than, but also slightly stronger strength. Mongolia was the most powerful empire in the world at that time. Only song could resist it for decades and could be counted as a powerful nation in the world. If considering the overall national strength, song should not only say weak, but also should be said to be quite strong. And the compared sites almost, the economy is more developed, the Eastern Jin Dynasty was not called poverty, why not give in this hat, this is obviously unfair. The Song Dynasty was brilliant Chinese dynasties in the history, but the poor and weak four words, like a heavy burden, the pressure on its head, and like a magnet attached to the body of the Song Dynasty, the mention of the Song Dynasty, people will immediately think of weak four words, the biggest characteristic of this thought is the Song Dynasty, and thus China mistakenly thought it was the worst in the history of the dynasty, and even disgusted with it, seems to be in addition to song, the song history is not worth mentioning. In the face of the stereotyp