国际贸易理论与实务习题.1（Exercises in international trade theory and practice.1）.docVIP

下载本文档

5
0
约1.38万字
约 11页
2017-08-16 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

国际贸易理论与实务习题.1（Exercises in international trade theory and practice.1）.doc

1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

国际贸易理论与实务习题.1（Exercises in international trade theory and practice.1）

国际贸易理论与实务习题.1（Exercises in international trade theory and practice.1） The original page has been transcoding from Baidu for viewing on mobile devices A: our refusal to open an L / C is justified on the basis of three: (1) our final power transfer list to sign a letter of confirmation shall prevail; (2) after the submission of a written contract with foreign drafts, we have not yet signed again, the establishment of a contract does not have the conditions; (3) the establishment of foreign contract neither, urging me to open the L / C should be rejected. A good 5. of Chinas A will be imported from another country to Frances B Bs offer, offer effective period of restoration: accept, please provide certificate of origin , A company has not been ignored. A month later, A received B letter of credit, letter of credit required to provide the certificate of origin because of the non commodity. Its products issued by the certificate of origin of Chinas commodity inspection agencies cannot. By B please cancel the letter of credit required in terms of the certificate of origin, rejected, and controversial.A company put forward he never to provide certificate of origin requirements agreed, in accordance with the law had no obligation to adhere to the A company and B business; the certificate of origin must be provided. Please amend the credit analysis of As request is reasonable, and explain the reasons. Analysis opinion: As proposed amendment requirements is not reasonable. Reason: both China and France are parties to the Convention, and the case should be dealt with in accordance with the provisions of the Convention (1) the Convention provisions, taking B requirements to provide certificate of origin in the complex, which is non substantial changes in the conditions of the offer, A received the B operators to make changes offer non substantive conditions to accept not raised any objection, acceptance is valid, the establishment of the contract. (2) B according to the contrac