实验性分离（Experimental isolation）.docVIP

实验性分离（Experimental isolation） Psychological Science 2000 th Volume 23 4 Four hundred and twelve Experimental separation between implicit and explicit memory tasks : The degree of coding and the requirement of extraction X Component (Department of education, Liaoning Normal University 116029) Coding level is manipulated (Experiment 1) and extraction requirements (Experiment 2) compare the operations between implicit and explicit memory tasks Change. The result shows There is a tendency of mutual inhibition between semantic and non semantic processing in encoding More awareness in the extraction requirements The participation of ingredients leads to more extraction of semantic components in earlier plots And rarely affect the extraction of non semantic components Coding level There is interaction between the extraction requirements and the extraction requirements. Key word The extraction of coding degree requires implicit memory and explicit memory 1 Preface A comparative study of implicit and explicit memory tasks was carried out using experimental dissociation techniques The manipulation of coding will make explicit Memory produces significant processing level effects Implicit memory is rarely affected [1]. Further research findings Encoding from semantics to non Varying degrees of semantics The semantic component increases as the processing stimulus increases The priming effect of explicit memory also increases large The priming effect of implicit memory is reduced [2]. Does this mean that different types of coded processing are complementary? Brown? (1991) research supports this finding [3]. however Craik, Moscovitch, and McDowd (1994) considers Processed Complementarity occurs mainly in comparison within the same task [3]. Information encoded in varying degrees How much of the extraction is affected by different extraction requirements? As stated above Explicit In memory Recall of deep processing items is superior to that of shallow processing items Implicit memo