【文章】漫谈规划（[article] rambling planning）.docVIP

【文章】漫谈规划（[article] rambling planning） Planning, the academic community does not have a uniform definition of it, but generally agrees that planning knowledge falls into two categories: 1, process (process) 2, products (product) This dichotomy has influenced planning theories and practices for nearly half a century, and continues to guide the theory and practice of our current planning. As a product (total rule, control rules, regulations, foreign zoning, regulation, comprehensive, planning etc.), planning by planning experts through rational design and produce this idea has a long history, which is the initial source of our planning, the earliest can be traced to Saint Simon and Comte. They believe that planning is the most reasonable and excellent practice of technical experts serving the public. This idea has been handed down very well, and this is the source of modernist planning, and it has led to the fact that planners are heroes (and our eighteen sisters goals). It was then believed that the planners who made decisions were not value free when they were making public decision making, and they were fully trusted to serve the public. The planning process (process) about the importance of the source in the last century, around 50s, the reason is serious failure expert technical rational product planning, most notably the famous words, American president Dwight Eishenhower said in 50s: plans are nothing, and that planning is everything. In our city planning design field, the experts failure, such as father-in-law highway planning, housing planning, focus only on the aesthetics of the international style, serious failure and so on City Renaissance led directly to the people on the planning process (process) attention, then people began to care about do absolute rational decision making experts can really value free the? Through the research on these questions, people discovered the importance of the planning process, it was discovered that the original focus only o