网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

Ⅰb~Ⅱb期宫颈癌先期化疗疗效探究.doc

  1. 1、本文档共3页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Ⅰb~Ⅱb期宫颈癌先期化疗疗效探究

Ⅰb~Ⅱb期宫颈癌先期化疗疗效探究[摘要] 目的 探讨Ⅰb~Ⅱb期宫颈癌术前先期治疗疗效。 方法 将我院84例宫颈癌患者分三组,其中,直接手术组28例,静脉化疗组25例,介入化疗组31例。静脉化疗组与介入化疗组在术前均进行先期化疗一疗程再手术,而直接手术组未进行任何处理直接手术治疗。分析三组化疗疗效及并发症情况。 结果 静脉化疗组与介入化疗组宫颈癌肿块缩小在临床分期、肿块大小、病理分类、病理分化方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(P 0.05)。静脉化疗组与直接手术组不良因素、高危因素比较,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05),与介入化疗组的(704.25±43.57)mL比较,差异无统计学意义(P 0.05)。直接手术组并发症发生率与静脉化疗组及介入化疗组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 术前新辅助化疗已广泛应用于Ⅰb~Ⅱb期宫颈癌患者,在实际临床工作中取得了良好效果,不仅能够减少患者预后不良因素,而且对术中出血量无明显影响,术后并发症亦没有明显增加,可以提高患者5年生存率和生活质量。 [关键词] 宫颈癌;新辅助化疗;介入化疗;静脉化疗;先期治疗 [中图分类号] R737.33 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2012)07(b)-0032-03 Research of effects of primary chemotherapy on Ⅰb-Ⅱb stage of cervical cancer SUN Yaling The People’s Hospital of Zunhua City, Hebei Province, Zunhua 064200, China [Abstract] Objective To discuss the effects of primary chemotherapy on Ⅰb-Ⅱb stage of cervical cancer. Methods 84 cases of patients with Ⅰb-Ⅱb stage of cervical cancer in our hospital were divided into three groups: direct surgery group (n = 28), venous chemotherapy group (n = 25) and intervention chemotherapy group (n = 31). Patients of the venous chemotherapy group and intervention chemotherapy group all underwent operation after one course of primary chemotherapy.Direct surgery group underwent operation without any processing. The efficacy of chemotherapy and complications among the three groups were compared. Results There were no significant differences in clinical stage, tumor size, histologic classification, pathologic differentiation of tumour reduction between venous chemotherapy group and interventional chemotherapy group (P 0.05).There were significant differences in adverse factors, risk factors between intervention chemotherapy group and direct surgery group (P 0.05) or interventional chemotherapy group [(704.25±43.57) mL] (P 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between direct surgery group and venous chemotherapy group or interventional chemotherapy group (P 0.05). Conclusion Preoperative neoadju

文档评论(0)

linsspace + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档