比较2%利多卡因及水润滑凝胶女性导尿的随机对照研究.pdfVIP

ORIGINAL ARTICLE A Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the 2% Lignocaine and Aqueous Lubricating Gels for Female Urethral Catheterization Moon Fai Chan, PhD, Cstat*; Hong Yun Tan, RN, MN*; Xia Lian, RN, MN*; Li Yuen Geraldine Ng, RN, MN*; Li Ling Emily Ang, RN, MN*; Lay Hoon Linda Lim, RN, MN*; Wai May Ng, RN, MN*; Mui Choo Yvonne Gwendoline Tan, RN, MN*; Beverley Joan Taylor, RN, PhD† *Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; †Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Gippsland campus, Churchill, Victoria, Australia Abstract Results: There was a significant reduction from the prepro- cedure pain score (Median = 22.0 mm) to the postprocedural Objective: The 2% lignocaine gel has long been used for pain score (Median = 6.6 mm) in the 2% lignocaine group male urethral catheterization, but aqueous gel as lubricant (Z = 3.8, P 0.001), but not in the aqueous gel group (pre has been used for females. However, studies report that vs. post: 16.5 mm vs. 18.2 mm; Z = 0.36, P = 0.716). Subjects females experience pain during urethral catheterization. We using 2% lignocaine gel had significantly more reduction in compared the effectiveness of 2% lignocaine gel (interven- the postprocedural pain score than