- 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
2013长宁区公立幼稚园
TORTS LECTURE 11;WHAT IS NUISANCE?;Our mission for tonight;THE TWO ‘SIDES’ OF NUISANCE;Private Nuisance- The Roadmap;Nuisance in context;1(a) Interference with land;1. Establishment- interference;P Baer Investments Pty Ltd v University of New South Wales [2007] NSWLEC 128; ;ONeill v Frost [2007] NSWLEC 400; BC200705292;Vella v Owners of Strata Plan 8670 [2007] NSWLEC 365; BC200704853;Hunt v Bedford — [2007] NSWLEC 130; BC200701745 ;1(b) The Balancing of Interests;“A dweller in towns cannot expect to have as pure air, as free from smoke, smell, and noise as if he lived in the country, and distant from other dwellings, and yet an excess of smoke, smell, and noise may give a cause of action, but in each of such cases it becomes a question of degree, and the question is in each case whether it amounts to a nuisance which will give a right of action.”
- Lord Halsbury in Colls v Home Colonial Stores [1904]
- Munro v Southern Dairies [1955], Hasley v Esso Petroleum [1961];Gray v State of New South Wales Matter No 2391/96 (31 July 1997);A useful test is perhaps what is reasonable according to the ordinary usages of mankind living in society, or more correctly in a particular society. (per Lord Wright in Sedleigh-Denfield v. OCallaghan (1940) AC, at p 903 );1(b) How do we balance?;Seidler v Luna Park Reserve Trust (1995) NSW Unreported;LUNA PARK CASES;Street 7 ors v Luna Park Sydney Pty Ltd 1 or [2006] NSWSC 230 (6 April 2006) ; THE NATURE OF D’S CONDUCT;2. WHO CAN SUE?;Doesn’t include P’s view of property;Who Can Sue? The Cases;“If a P, such as the daughter in Khorsandjian, is harassed by abusive telephone calls, the gravamen of the complaint lies in the harassment which is just as much an abuse, or indeed an invasion of her privacy, whether she is pestered in this way in her mother’s house, or even in her car with a mobile phone. In truth, what the CA appears to have been doing was to exploit the law of private nuisance in order to create by the back do
文档评论(0)