(专家意见)机械通气系统效能评估指标的建立.pdfVIP

2011 7 26 13 ( ) 25 1 2* 1 陈丽丽 ,李红 , 李娜 : 应用Delphi 法筛选机械通气系统效能评估指标 根据研究主题遴选 25 名从 危重症治疗和护理工作的咨询专 家,采用Delphi 法进行两轮咨询两轮咨询问卷回收率分别为100% 和96% ;专家权威系数均为0. 89;专家意见的协调系数 分别为0. 47 和0.49, 差异有统计学意义(均P 0. 01) ; 两轮咨询后, 最终确定由3 个维度14 个评估指标和60 条评估依据组成 的机械通气效能评估指标体系 此研究专家代表性强, 积极性高, 权威程度协调性好, 最终形成的机械通气系统效能评估 指标可为临床医务人员科学合理评估机械通气综合效能提供依据 : 机械通气; Delphi 法; 效能评估; 指标筛选 :R472 :A : 1001-4152( 2011) 13-0025-04 DOI 10. 3870/ hlxzz.2011. 13. 025 : Construction of efficiency evaluation indicators for mechanical ventilation system Chen L ili, L i H ong , L i Na ( School of N ur- sing , Fuj ian Medical Univ ersity , F uz hou 50004 , China) Abstract: Objective o screen efficiency evaluation indicators for mechanical ventilat ion syst em through Delphi method.Methods Ac- cording to our research objectives, w e chose 25 experts majored in intensive care and critical nursing care to conduct two rounds consultat ion by using Delphi method.Results here w ere 100% of the issued questionnaires in t he 1st round and 96% in the 2nd round successfully collect ed respectively. he specialist authority coeff icient was 0. 89. he coordination coefficients for 2 rounds were 0.47 and 0.49 respectively ( P 0. 01 for all) .After the consultation, t he efficiency evaluation indicator system of mechanical vent ilat ion w as finally formulat ed, containing 3 dimensions, 14 evaluation indexes and 60 evaluation items. Conclusion he selected experts w ere highly representative, and they w ere enthusiastically involved in the consult ation. And the system has remarkable au- thority and coordination; it can provide basis for clinical medical personnel in scientific and reasonable evaluation. Key words: mechanical ventilation