站在历史的高度审视怒江水电开发的争论(国外英文资料).docVIP

站在历史的高度审视怒江水电开发的争论(国外英文资料) Standing at a historical height, the source of the debate over hydropower development in Nu River: China Journal of Hydropower Engineering Society: Chen Binglongs Journal This year is the beginning of our 12th Five-Year plan. We are pleased to see that in the 12th Five-Year plan, the description of hydropower has undergone a fundamental change, from the past emphasis on orderly development of Hydropower into preferential development of hydropower.. Why has this changed so much? Because of the economic and social environment, ecological and social problems have become increasingly serious in China, and the international community consistent with the requirements of greenhouse gas emission reduction under pressure, we began to realize finally, in recent years, the anti anti Dam Hydropower rumors for our country and the whole world caused harm. As we all know, before we enter the modern industrial society, our society relies mainly on renewable energy - biomass energy. After entering modernization, the average power energy in developed countries in the world is about 20% from renewable water power, and some countries mainly come from hydropower. These countries, which rely mainly on hydropower resources, are not only generally good in their ecological environment, but also will not have much pressure to reduce their emissions. Norway, for example, has been giving priority to the development and utilization of renewable water power because of its rich water resources and advanced vision. Norway has been the first to develop and utilize renewable water power. So far, 99.8% of Norways electricity comes from hydropower, and although they have plenty of oil and coal themselves, they have not been mined so far. Southern Europe, France, water resources are not many, but they have already developed and utilized one hundred percent. So they took the lead in Europe to end their coal production. Subsequently, the water power development level as high as