假言推理规则(外国英语资料).docVIP

  1. 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
假言推理规则(外国英语资料)

假言推理规则 Yes and yes, no are contradictory; All non and yes are a pair of contradictory relations; There is a contradiction between yes and no The definition of a subject, hypothetical reasoning rules The complex proposition occupies a certain proportion in the national civil service exam for test, and the hypothetical proposition as a key complex proposition, it has a high value, easy to grasp, candidates need to master the knowledge points. On the form of a hypothetical proposition, hypothetical reasoning rules are easy to learn and master the Hebei civil service examination network conducted brief introduction. What is the hypothetical derived topic? What is given some hypothetical proposition, and ask so what can be concluded, which can launch what? This kind of problem, is hypothetical derived problems for this kind of problems, we need to do is in the title of the hypothetical proposition into the form of A--B, then we use inference rules of a hypothetical proposition (hypothetical proposition and its inverse proposition is equivalent) and false proposition of the chain of reasoning (if there is A--B, B--C, then A--C) to determine the options. Analytical exercises and answers two questions, hypothetical reasoning rules 1, a is a necessary condition for B, and C is a sufficient condition for B, but not a necessary condition for b.: A, C is a sufficient condition for a, not a necessary condition for a. B, C is a necessary condition for a single, not a sufficient condition C and C are necessary and sufficient conditions for a D and C are neither the sufficient condition nor the necessary condition of a Answer: A Analysis: this problem is a typical type of hypothetical reasoning rules, then we found the inference relation contained in the question is: C / B / A, then the four option is to ask us a and C. We find that C can introduce a, then C is a sufficient condition of a, and a can not launch C, because the inverse proposition is not to determine the true and fal

文档评论(0)

f8r9t5c + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8000054077000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档