O.J.simpson的.pptVIP

The O.J .simpson murder case The O. J. Simpson murder case (officially the People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson) was a criminal trial held at the Los Angeles County Superior Court in California. The former professional football star and actor O. J. Simpson was tried on two counts of murder after the deaths of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and waiter Ronald Lyle Goldman, in June 1994. The case has been described as the most publicized criminal trial in American history. Simpson was acquitted after a trial that lasted more than eight months. Evidences of O. J. Simpson Murder Case Blood Stain Blood stains found at the crime scene were tested to determine blood type and to provide DNA samples. Blood stains were found in O.J. Simpsons white Bronco, on a pair of socks in his bedroom, on the pair of gloves, at the crime scene, in O.J. Simpsons driveway and in his house. The prosecution states that the blood evidence proves that O.J. Simpson is the murderer, while the defense contends that the blood was contaminated and/or planted. reasonable doubt In light of the seriousness of the penalties for violating a criminal law, both the Constitution and statutory law 、federal and state codes impose strict sets of procedural rules to ensure that persons who are accused of criminal acts are tried fairly and convicted only if guilt has been established beyond a reasonable doubt. 由于违反刑法的处罚严重，宪法和制定法 、联邦法典和州法典都规定了严格的程序原则来确保被指控有犯罪行为的人得到公正的审判，并且只有达到排除了合理怀疑程度，才可做出有罪判决。 reasonable doubt Criminal defendants are presumed innocent. The state must overcome this presumption of innocence by proving every element of the offense charged against the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt to the satisfaction of all the jurors. 刑事被告人是被推定无罪的。国家要想推翻这一无罪推定，必须通过证明被告人被控犯罪的每一构成要件都排除合理怀疑，从而让所有陪审员满意。 The exclusionary rule of illegal evidence The exclusionary rule of illegal evidence is an important and complicated rule in evidence rules system. It is a kind of rules to excludi