陈某诉A公司等股权转让合同纠纷案评析.pdfVIP

陈某诉A 公司等股权转让合同纠纷案评析 摘 要 出资是股东对公司最基本的义务,各国公司法都规定了股东违反出资义务的 严格责任,瑕疵出资虽在实践中并不鲜见，但由瑕疵出资引发的瑕疵股权转让纠纷, 涉及到股权转让的效力,对之现行《公司法》和司法解释均没有明确规定,理论界 也未达成共识,导致各地法院审判此类案件执法不一,影响了司法裁判的公信力。 《陈某诉A 公司等股权转让合同纠纷案评析》讨论的瑕疵出资股权转让争议 案历时三年，其背后涉及到企业、债权人和出资人等各方的利益博弈，要兼顾各 方利益，平息纠纷，不仅对我国瑕疵出资股权转让实践工作提出了挑战，也对检 验我国瑕疵出资股权转让理论有重要意义。具体案例的审判过程更能体现上述意 义：瑕疵出资能否享有股东资格，严则以实际出资的实质要件为标准，瑕疵出资 者便不能享有股东资格，此举会伤害那些相信商事外观主义原则的第三人的利益， 宽则以商法的公式主义为标准，然则势必会影响公司资本；瑕疵出资股权的可转 让性及转让协议效力的判定问题，作为自益权的瑕疵出资股权转让权的限制与否 直接关系到转让协议效力的有效无效抑或是可撤销，直接关系到转让方与受让方 之间的权利义务和两者分别对公司、债权人的权利义务的关系；股权转让协议生 效后，合同是否实际履行，其股权究竟何时开始从转让方转移至受让方。这些问 题的存在，使得该案在处理过程中更增加了复杂性。我国应当在研究和总结国内 外理论和实践基础上，探讨上述问题的具体规则，最终形成立法，完善我国公司 法。 关键词：瑕疵出资；可转让性；协议效力 II 硕士学位论文 Abstract Capital contribution is the most basic obligation to shareholders of the company. The company law legislation in all countries have regulated the shareholders in violation of the obligations with strict liability. But the flaws capital contribution is common in practice. Caused by defective capital contribution flaw equity transfer issue, defective capital contribution involves the effectiveness of the equity transfer. Comparied with the current company law and judicial interpretation of all, which does not make clear a regulation, the defective capital contribution in the theoretical circle has not reached a consensus. Therefore there were different court enforcement of such cases, which affected the judicial referees credibility. “An analysis on the defective share transfer of Mr.Chen against A company” discusses the flaws capital contribution of equity transfer which has been three years, behind of which