- 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
【2017年整理】Solutions to Exercises(DBMS)
《Introduction to Database System》 Solutions to Exercises Li Ping Chapter 2 The Entity-Relationship Data Model Exercise 2.1.1: Let us design a database for a bank, including information about customers and their accounts. Information about a customer includes their name, address, phone, and Social Security number. Accounts have numbers, types (e.g., savings, checking) and balances. We also need to record the customer(s) who own an account. Draw the E/R diagram for this database. Be sure to include arrows where appropriate, to indicate the multiplicity of a relationship. P.36 Solution: Exercise 2.1.6: Suppose we wish to keep a genealogy. We shall have one entity set, People. The information we wish to record about persons includes their name(an attribute) and the following relationships: mother, father, and children. Given an E/R diagram involving the People entity set and all the relationships in which it is involved. Include relationships for mother, father, and children. Do not forget to indicate roles when an entity set is used more than once in a relationship. Solution: Exercise 2.2.1: In Fig. 2.14 is an E/R diagram for a bank database involving customers and accounts. Since customers may have several accounts, and accounts may be held joint by several customers, we associate with each customer an “account set”, and accounts are members of one or more account sets. Assuming the meaning of the various relationships and attributes are as expected given their names, criticize the design. What design rules are violated? Why? What modifications would you suggest? P.44 Solution: 1. The Addresses entity set is nothing but a single address, so we would prefer to make address an attribute of Customers. Were the bank to record several addresses for a customer, then it might make sense to have an Addresses entity set and make Lives-at a many-many relationship. 2. The Acct-Sets entity set is useless. Each customer has a unique account set conta
您可能关注的文档
- 【2017年整理】GMAT 阅读解析8-BY 申友Alice老师.doc
- 【2017年整理】GMAT&_GRE&_LSAT所有阅读全真题及答案.doc
- 【2017年整理】GMAT700分如何备考.doc
- 【2017年整理】GMAT6个高分集.doc
- 【2017年整理】GMAT作文之AA七宗罪.doc
- 【2017年整理】GMAT准备篇章:管卫东谈GMAT备考-重在训练思维.doc
- 【2017年整理】GMAT句子作用(Boldface)题例解.doc
- 【2017年整理】GMAT培训机构分析.doc
- 【2017年整理】GMAT大牛高分心得——原创突击.doc
- 【2017年整理】GMAT作文全中文翻译.doc
文档评论(0)