10-Criminal law.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共19页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
10-Criminal law

Miranda Warning You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to have an attorney present during questioning. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you at government expense. Do you understand these rights? Right to be silent may be granted (China Daily) Updated: 2007-05-18 07:00 You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law... These words, familiar to many from Hollywood movies or cops-and-robbers TV shows, could be uttered by Chinese police if an amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law, scheduled for October, is approved. A draft amendment the All- China Lawyers Association (ACLA) submitted last month to the Standing Committee of the National Peoples Congress (NPC), the top legislature, included both stipulations. The existing Criminal Procedure Law, amended in 1997, requires suspects to truthfully answer investigators questions during interrogations. It also stipulates that lawyers are allowed in the case only after the first interrogation. These stipulations are believed to be at the root of forced confessions. An inspection by the NPC Standing Committee in 2000 showed that forced confessions did exist in the country. Some police officers even take turns to question the suspect, and an interrogation could last for days, Chen Ruihua said. It is believed that such changes will help prevent forced confessions and facilitate lawyers increased participation in criminal defense. Miranda vs. Arizona Opinions Warren, C.J., opinion of the Court The cases before us raise questions which go to the roots of our concepts of American criminal jurisprudence: the restraints society must observe consistent with the Federal Constitution in prosecuting individuals for crime. More specifically, we deal with the admissibility of statements obtained from an individual who is subjected to custodial police interrog

文档评论(0)

l215322 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档