活血接骨止痛膏联合萘丁美酮治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床观察.docVIP

活血接骨止痛膏联合萘丁美酮治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床观察.doc

  1. 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
活血接骨止痛膏联合萘丁美酮治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床观察.doc

活血接骨止痛膏联合萘丁美酮治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床观察   【摘 要】目的:观察平乐正骨传统膏药活血接骨止痛膏联合萘丁美酮治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法:将100例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组50例。对照组给予核心肌力训练及萘丁美酮胶囊口服治疗,治疗组在对照组治疗的基础上联合活血接骨止痛膏外敷。7 d为1个疗程,共3个疗程。治疗前后采用JOA下腰痛评分(JOA评分)、Oswestry腰背部功能障碍指数(ODI指数)进行评定,并比较两组临床疗效。结果:治疗组完成治疗41例,优5例,良23例,可8例,差5例,优良率为68.29%;对照组完成治疗42例,优2例,良15例,可11例,差14例,优良率为40.48%。两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。治疗后,两组JOA评分、ODI指数较治疗前均有明显改善(P 0.05);且治疗组优于对照组(P 0.05)。结论:腰背肌肌力训练联合口服萘丁美酮胶囊对腰椎间盘突出症有一定疗效,辅以活血接骨止痛膏效果更加显著,活血接骨止痛膏外敷是腰椎间盘突出症保守治疗的有效辅助疗法。   【关键词】 腰椎间盘突出症;萘丁美酮;活血接骨止痛膏;腰背肌功能锻炼   doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4174.2015.12.004   【ABSTRACT】 Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy of Huoxue Jiegu Zhitong Gao (活血接骨止痛膏) combined with nabumetone in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.Methods:One hundred cases of lumbar disc herniation were randomly divided into a treatment group and a control group,50 cases in each.The control group was given the core strength training and nabumetone capsule,while the treatment group was given external application of Huoxue Jiegu Zhitong Gao based on the treatment of the control group,7 days for 1 course and   3 courses altogether.Before and after the treatment,both groups were evaluated with JOA low back pain curative effect evaluation (JOA score) and Oswestry lumbar dysfunction index(ODI) and their clinical curative effects were compared.Results:In the treatment group,41 cases finished their treatment,among which 5 cases were excellent,23 cases were better,8 cases were good,and 5 cases were not good,the fineness rate being 68.29%;while in the control group,42 cases finished their treatment among which 2 cases were excellent,15 cases were better,   11 cases were good,and 14 cases were not good,the fineness rate being 40.48%.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05).After treatment,the JOA score and ODI of the two groups were significantly improved compared with those before treatment (P 0.05),and the treatment group was better than the control group (P 0.05).C

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

yingzhiguo + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:5243141323000000

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档